Queen sucks
Bowie is ok
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
32Bowie. I "like" Queens early records but even then, it's a bit too tasteless/campy/yucky IMO; I have to be in a very specific zone to appreciate that stuff. Bowie may be overrated but it is more his status as well as his approach to artistry and record making that is overrated, the records themselves were frequently good-to-excellent.
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
33Queen actually did more of these wacky novelty songs after they were established. I agree they are dumb and tasteless, what I believe is called fun around these parts. As far as vision exceeding craft, Bowie had one of the best rhythm sections in the world and routinely pulled in brilliant people. I think it's more that he lacked completeness of vision. He would have a cool idea and get cool people to work on it, but he often struggled to put all the pieces together.zorg wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 4:21 amI disagree strongly with almost everything you've written here, so I think I'll just let it stand at that if there was something Bowie had in spades, and Queen was clearly lacking, it was taste, in pretty much all aspects. I totally respect that a lesser band could never get me to listen to something like Fat Bottom Girls, Bicycle or Crazy Little Thing, but they pull it off because they are talented and affable as fuck. But it's all hideous music they are rescuing by sheer power of will. It's like if Bowie never progressed past the Laughing Gnome. If you argue that Bowie's vision exceeded the craft at times, I could concede maybe it had.biscuitdough wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:18 pm Low is really unfinished, to my ear, and Lodger has a phoned-in quality where he returns to the glam-era boogie non-riffs and the dumb dramatic deep voice. Heroes is, to me, the great Bowie album.
Neither Bowie nor Queen were solid album artists. Queen were all over the place thematically, and Bowie just fucking loved filler. All the ambient stuff on Low is just Eno outtakes and incomplete sketches, sometimes with a guitar solo added on. If there's a "they never did anything like..." though, it's Scary Monsters.
This is getting into Bowie vs Queen, and Bowie definitely had the most hideous album artwork, if that works as a deciding factor. Diamond Dogs and the US version of The Man Who Sold The World being the most obvious.
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
34I very much appreciated this comment.biscuitdough wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 7:48 am I agree they are dumb and tasteless, what I believe is called fun around these parts.
jason (he/him/his) from volo (illinois)
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
35I can agree with this to some extent, but think that's part of the charm. Was he ever gonna be as singular as the VU, Scott Walker, or Kraftwerk? Probably not. But what a thing to strive for, sometimes with spectacular results, and sure as shit no one else was doing those things at the time.biscuitdough wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 7:48 am As far as vision exceeding craft, Bowie had one of the best rhythm sections in the world and routinely pulled in brilliant people. I think it's more that he lacked completeness of vision. He would have a cool idea and get cool people to work on it, but he often struggled to put all the pieces together.
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
36I like all the 80's mixed bag Bowie (maybe the Labyrinth codpiece jam pushing my tolerance a considerable degree) but I think it started to show some serious cracks when he wanted to be Trent Reznor. Soft spot for what he did on the Lost Highway soundtrack notwithstanding. Late period stuff, even the fawned about Blackstar? I could take it or leave it.penningtron wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 8:02 amI can agree with this to some extent, but think that's part of the charm. Was he ever gonna be as singular as the VU, Scott Walker, or Kraftwerk? Probably not. But what a thing to strive for, sometimes with spectacular results, and sure as shit no one else was doing those things at the time.biscuitdough wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 7:48 am As far as vision exceeding craft, Bowie had one of the best rhythm sections in the world and routinely pulled in brilliant people. I think it's more that he lacked completeness of vision. He would have a cool idea and get cool people to work on it, but he often struggled to put all the pieces together.
janeway wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:52 am i do want to apologize if i offended anybody with my posts lately .. i was in denial of my impulses going wild
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
37Bowie. Queen is just so, so fucking dumb. There’s a reason so many of those songs have become sports chants. Under Pressure is pretty much the ONLY Queen song that doesn’t suck. And that duh duh dumb dumb day part is, you guessed it: terrible.
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
38"Ogre Battle" and "Father to Son" are fucking awesome.
I'd rather be throwing darts.
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
39If want to be certain you've obtained consent, I think playing fucking Ogre Battle beforehand would be unassailable.
janeway wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:52 am i do want to apologize if i offended anybody with my posts lately .. i was in denial of my impulses going wild
Re: Under Pressure Dome: David Bowie vs. Queen
40I've grown to appreciate Queen more as my daughter loves them, but Bowie all the way. I definitely check out after Scary Monsters, but almost everything up that point is pretty much unfuckwithable in my book. Mick Ronson gets so much of the attention, but I would put Carlos Alomar up there with him any day, he's a monster player.
Band: https://cushingsound.bandcamp.com/music
Building Pedals: https://www.instagram.com/bttrnx_america/
Building Pedals: https://www.instagram.com/bttrnx_america/