If the someone was me, I have to say reggae and punk intersected a lot in the squats of the late 70s UK youth scene and that’s not the problem. I just haven’t really heard Clash songs that weren’t mediocre attempts at reggae from white punks.indiegrab_360 wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:16 pmI have heard a couple stories about The Clash from someone who was around the scene and in a contemporary group (though slightly different genre of music) that played a show or two with them. Story goes//// The Clash changed their sound to fit in with "World Music" which was the trend of the day, and this guy called them out for it in a group social setting and said it was kind of lame... and he was wayy ostracized by lead singer of the Clash or whatever... and from then on everyone in the scene who didn't want to be associated with this specific guy for speaking his mind or not censoring his opinion more or less. Kind of funny because as someone else pointed out, mixing punk with reggae hasn't exactly aged well. Makes you look at all those rock docs in a different light. Sort of self-glorification and the average person just buys into whatever is said in them.Vibracobra wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 9:09 amI do like some tracks scattered through their discography, but yeah, you're right.A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Wed Jun 23, 2021 11:48 pm I'm supposed to like The Clash, right? Well they're shit. End of.
Nick Cave too.
Most of Nick Cave records I find them boring, but Let Love in is pretty awesome.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
122I’ve gotten yelled out of rooms for saying this but the Clash were the Monkees of punk rock. Not to be taken seriously, a few catchy tunes within an absolute dumpster of a catalog, and an inexplicably rabid fan base that should know better based on the rest of their tastes.
Crap. No waffles.
Crap. No waffles.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
123The Monkees pulled out a couple of really good songs and a brilliant movie. The Clash weren’t as bad as you say IMO, but more of a Johnny Mathis: capable enough, I might leave them on if they come on the radio, but why bother doing that thing they do?Frankie99 wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 11:12 pm I’ve gotten yelled out of rooms for saying this but the Clash were the Monkees of punk rock. Not to be taken seriously, a few catchy tunes within an absolute dumpster of a catalog, and an inexplicably rabid fan base that should know better based on the rest of their tastes.
Crap. No waffles.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
124I think getting yelled at for not liking something is just as stupid as being yelled at for liking it. There needn't be any sacred cows in rock music, and if rock journalists somehow made something sound mandatory it neither speaks for nor against the quality of that artist (but goddamn I understand it can make it difficult (see the entire existence of the band U2)).
I also like The Monkees and The Clash.
I also, also think there isn't a hint of guilty displeasure, or (I should actually love this) to be found here.
I also like The Monkees and The Clash.
I also, also think there isn't a hint of guilty displeasure, or (I should actually love this) to be found here.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
125You’re probably spot on, but it’s a fun conversation.losthighway wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 11:24 pm I think getting yelled at for not liking something is just as stupid as being yelled at for liking it. There needn't be any sacred cows in rock music, and if rock journalists somehow made something sound mandatory it neither speaks for nor against the quality of that artist (but goddamn I understand it can make it difficult (see the entire existence of the band U2)).
I also like The Monkees and The Clash.
I also, also think there isn't a hint of guilty displeasure, or (I should actually love this) to be found here.
Rick and Morty, by the way, was very funny a couple times, but I fundamentally agree with what you said.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
126It's the "should" I struggle with. It is absolutely a fun conversation, so not trying to piss on the campfire.losthighway wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 11:24 pm I think getting yelled at for not liking something is just as stupid as being yelled at for liking it. There needn't be any sacred cows in rock music, and if rock journalists somehow made something sound mandatory it neither speaks for nor against the quality of that artist (but goddamn I understand it can make it difficult (see the entire existence of the band U2)).
I also like The Monkees and The Clash.
I also, also think there isn't a hint of guilty displeasure, or (I should actually love this) to be found here.
Another conversation - maybe less fun, but also interesting - is everyone looking at their own "should" part, working out who's saying it (for them), and why we give a shit about what they think.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
127Happy Mondays/Black Grape
janeway wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:52 am i do want to apologize if i offended anybody with my posts lately .. i was in denial of my impulses going wild
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
128Totally. There's a natural knee-jerk against some imagined authority telling us what to like.Dudley wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 5:24 am Another conversation - maybe less fun, but also interesting - is everyone looking at their own "should" part, working out who's saying it (for them), and why we give a shit about what they think.
I know a dude who just hates David Foster Wallace because of his sense of the type of insufferable, pretentious people who put him on a pedestal. Those people exist. Unfortunately they detract from all of the humanity and wit of his writing.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
129Yes! Like an internalised straw-man argument!losthighway wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 11:28 am
Totally. There's a natural knee-jerk against some imagined authority telling us what to like.
Re: Guilty Displeasures (I should actually love this)
130Oh Christ, speaking of which. I’ll admit I haven’t tried Infinite Jest, but I really can’t stand the self-consciously clever tone of his writing. There’s definitely a reason he appeals so strongly to out of touch, snobby 20something white dudes.losthighway wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 11:28 amTotally. There's a natural knee-jerk against some imagined authority telling us what to like.Dudley wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 5:24 am Another conversation - maybe less fun, but also interesting - is everyone looking at their own "should" part, working out who's saying it (for them), and why we give a shit about what they think.
I know a dude who just hates David Foster Wallace because of his sense of the type of insufferable, pretentious people who put him on a pedestal. Those people exist. Unfortunately they detract from all of the humanity and wit of his writing.