Re: Music genre revisionist history

12
Neil Young had a Kurt Cobain tribute song and took Sonic Youth on tour, and used Pearl Jam as a backing band, I think that's Grunge enough for anyone. Also, not many people know this, but he invented flannel.
janeway wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:52 am i do want to apologize if i offended anybody with my posts lately .. i was in denial of my impulses going wild

Re: Music genre revisionist history

13
Danger Bird is grunge as fuck. He's covered a lot genre wise over the decades, obviously, but the feedback laden, chugging, slogging, Crazy Horse shit with the wild solos that sound like everything is melting down around them...that's some of my favorite music ever recorded. And I'd say the precursor to grunge label is totally appropriate.
Radio show https://www.wmse.org/program/the-tom-wa ... xperience/
My band https://redstuff.bandcamp.com/
Solo project https://tomwanderer.bandcamp.com/

Re: Music genre revisionist history

14
seby wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:29 am You know that the intro to Mudhoney's "Broken Hands" is the Outro to Neil Young and Crazy Horse's "Cinnamon Girl", right?
Hole played a similar move on the debut, if memory serves (can't recall the exact riff). And Dinosaur were covering a Neil song live at the time also ('Like a Hurricane', maybe? Or was it 'Cortez'?)

Point is, it was v. hip to reference Mr Young at that time in that early grunge / proto-grunge scene.

Re: Music genre revisionist history

16
seby wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:29 am FWIW Mudhoney always cited The Stooges, Blue Cheer, and early Neil Young as big influences - along with The Scientists. When I listen to Mudhoney this is what I hear.

You know that the intro to Mudhoney's "Broken Hands" is the Outro to Neil Young and Crazy Horse's "Cinnamon Girl", right? Let alone that they sound like the very same band. The homage is brazen, open worship on Mudhoney's part:



I have always loved this little connector. Thanks for bringing this up.
New Shit:
https://lamekites.bandcamp.com/album/less-one
Discogs:
https://www.discogs.com/seller/ryanzepaltas/profile

Re: Music genre revisionist history

18
seby wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:29 am FWIW Mudhoney always cited The Stooges, Blue Cheer, and early Neil Young as big influences - along with The Scientists.
Funny little aside: I admittedly haven't listened to Mudhoney a whole lot, but feel I know what their general sound is and could recognize if a song was recorded by them. My friend who seemed to be into most of Kurt Cobain's favorite bands once put on the 1985 self-titled feedtime album and I immediately thought with 100% conviction it was Mudhoney.

Re: Music genre revisionist history

19
losthighway wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 7:46 am Lord, emo. I'm on this 90s hardcore/punk/emo Facebook group where people share cool records and nostalgia. Once in a while someone gets on a high horse about "real emo" and I always bristle. If Rites of Spring, Angel Hair and Christie Front Drive are all emo then wtf is emo anyway? Weezer isn't really emo but emo isn't really real.
I spent a while covering what I believe "emo" pretty much applies to here:



Again, not on any high horse, just bringing up my perspective. It's all gravy really.

I actually think some of this is kinda funny. Seeing as I was in a scene band in NJ in 2004-05. The height of the MySpace/Purevolume wave.
The term "emo" kind of splits into about 3 distinct different sub-genres rather quickly...
1. acoustic,
2. post-hardcore/aggressive/screamo,,, and then
3. Pop/Rock I guess.

A lot of confusion around hardcore/punk vs. post-hardcore of the emo variety. Because a lot of bands mix a variety of styles but were active during the 2001-07 wave.

I dunno seems like in these genre histories, the authors desperately want the history to be long and illustrious and fit into a certain mold, even if that's not completely accurate. Like writing an essay or something where you have to hit on various different points, make sure everyone gets mentioned (regardless if they're even really involved).

Re: Music genre revisionist history

20
indiegrab_360 wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 3:15 pm
losthighway wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 7:46 am Lord, emo. I'm on this 90s hardcore/punk/emo Facebook group where people share cool records and nostalgia. Once in a while someone gets on a high horse about "real emo" and I always bristle. If Rites of Spring, Angel Hair and Christie Front Drive are all emo then wtf is emo anyway? Weezer isn't really emo but emo isn't really real.
I spent a while covering what I believe "emo" pretty much applies to here:



Again, not on any high horse, just bringing up my perspective. It's all gravy really.

I actually think some of this is kinda funny. Seeing as I was in a scene band in NJ in 2004-05. The height of the MySpace/Purevolume wave.
The term "emo" kind of splits into about 3 distinct different sub-genres rather quickly...
1. acoustic,
2. post-hardcore/aggressive/screamo,,, and then
3. Pop/Rock I guess.

A lot of confusion around hardcore/punk vs. post-hardcore of the emo variety. Because a lot of bands mix a variety of styles but were active during the 2001-07 wave.

I dunno seems like in these genre histories, the authors desperately want the history to be long and illustrious and fit into a certain mold, even if that's not completely accurate. Like writing an essay or something where you have to hit on various different points, make sure everyone gets mentioned (regardless if they're even really involved).
Straight talk?

You dropped the ball right around the time where you said "I don't much about Jawbreaker..."

Any attempt to school folks when you just said "I don't know much about Jawbreaker..."?

It's right on the verge of face planting.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: hyljetronic and 1 guest