I enjoy

Hüsker Dü, please let them win.
Total votes: 35 (73%)
The Clash, and don't want them destroyed.
Total votes: 13 (27%)
Total votes: 48

Either-Or: H ¼sker D ¼ or the Clash

14
The Clash is Booooring.

Hüsker helped me survive high school. And they had a very good, "punch you in the face" wall of sound going on when I saw them live in 1987 at the end of their career. When I heard this sound, it was very unique. I hadn't heard other bands playing full major chords with that much thick distortion before. I know they weren't the first, but Mould was an amazing guitarist and animated frontperson who had his shit together. Very intense too.

The Clash is one of the least interesting bands to come out of the UK in the late 1970's IMO.

Hüsker Dü wins.
Last edited by mrarrison_Archive on Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Either-Or: H ¼sker D ¼ or the Clash

17
you guys all picked husker du. What the fuck is wrong with you? Have you heard their late albums?

Sure the clash have one major turd, but "the huskers" have at the very least, two and a half total shit albums.

This is beyond me. The clash are better in every single way, most importantly, they have very few songs full of boring and trite garbage music and lyrics, and I suppose I admire the fact that they were somewhat responsible for turning many english crackers on to reggae and dub, which I would say leads to one of the best genre/period/handful of bands ever.

The Clash.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 197 guests