^A great article. Thank you!

Chromodynamic wrote:

alex maiolo wrote:He's Christian, but he's also kind. He believes in creationism, but doesn't think it excludes evolution - which is one of many ways to define "intelligent design," a very misunderstood term by the Left.

I would just like to say that 'intelligent design' isn't misunderstood at all, It has and always will be complete horseshit.

P.S. - Mitt Romney is crap.

It's more complex than people make it.

Do you think there is a difference between someone who says:
"I believe that god created everything around us, and that fossils were put here to fool us and test our faith."
-and-
"I believe things are far too complex to be an accident, and it's very possible that there was some sort of divine intervention, but after the Big Bang, yeah, evolution took over The Great Plan, or whatever you want to cal it."

I do. I think there's a big, big difference.
Both, however, and acceptable versions of "intelligent design."
The zealots have actually co-opted the term when the latter example I gave is much more in line with what it originally meant.
It sounds better than "creationism" because it uses the word "intelligent," and the zealots know that.

Intelligent Design is what full-on scientists who are also religious use as an arguement for how they can believe in both things.

And yes, Romney is total crap.

-A

alex maiolo wrote:

Chromodynamic wrote:

alex maiolo wrote:He's Christian, but he's also kind. He believes in creationism, but doesn't think it excludes evolution - which is one of many ways to define "intelligent design," a very misunderstood term by the Left.

I would just like to say that 'intelligent design' isn't misunderstood at all, It has and always will be complete horseshit.

P.S. - Mitt Romney is crap.

It's more complex than people make it.

...

Intelligent Design is what full-on scientists who are also religious use as an arguement for how they can believe in both things.

And yes, Romney is total crap.

I think the baffling complexity of the universe is properly addressed by theanthropic principle, which is what full-on scientists should probably use as an argument for how they can believe in both things.

after I moved from Boston I remember being shocked at my MA electing Romney Guvna.

Even my non republican friends voted for him. I have a sinking feeling he will bamboozle the rest of the USA as well and will be our next president.

Oh and he is the epitome of a 2 faced lying politician and clearly a soul less corporate douchewhore

I fear for our nation, it is about to get Mitt-Raped

Hexpane wrote:I fear for our nation, it is about to get Mitt-Raped

He is a very scary man...but as a cynical sort of dude, I am not afraid that this guy has a chance at being our president.

There's a great article on Romney in this week's New Yorker (the one with the Cheney as jack-o-lantern cover).

[/quote]
America is not ready for talk of magic underwear, polygamy, or a 19th century savior. -A[/quote]

I don't know about the rest of America, but I've been waiting to talk about magic underwear and polygamy for YEARS. They can keep the 19th century savior though, thanks.

They had a sound bite of Mitt at a campaign stop on NPR this morning saying something to the effect of "If you want less liberty, more taxes and big brother, vote for a democrat."

Hahahahahaha

CRAP

The Mittenator is a 2-1 fav to win IMO.

Pro abortion? Vote for mitt
Anti abortion? vote for mitt
pro gun nut? vote for mitt
anti gun nut? vote for mitt
afraid of terror? vote for mitt
want less government? vote for mitt
want lower taxes? vote for mitt

thats basically his political "stance" , anything to get a nomination

you don't think he can win? he won in MA.

maybe mitt romney and wife are captain and mrs. underpants.

there's no way a mormon is gonna be elected. if he is elected i can no longer be at all optimistic about the inteligence of the average american.