Page 6 of 16
Band: Interpol
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:01 pm
by agent202
i'v see interpole on stage one time, 2 or 3 years ago, they where on tour with girls vs boys, interpole made the openning, thay played a regular show,clean,good students, after that their roadies clean the stage and gvsb came on stage carriing theyr own materiel, make a line ckeck of 5 minutes leave for 2 minutes and play 1 hours a fucking good show.......
result:
gvsb :3 interpole: 0
but i will not said crap, some of they'r stuff are really good
Band: Interpol
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:49 pm
by Get dog costumes_Archive
oucheh wrote:Their rhythm section sounds like every other band right now that's aping well tread retro territory. Also, I couldn't give a shit about the Oxes.
No it doesn't. What separates Interpol from the Killers, Franz Ferdinand, and numerous other derivative post-punk revival bands is that Carlos D and Sam Fogarino are awesome. Much of the basslines and drumming on the first album are as good as anything Les Pattinson and Pete de Freitas ever did. No other neo-new wave act gets into as good a groove as "Specialist" or "NYC." In particular, the bass playing on "Obstacle 1" is awesome. Every time I hear this song, the rhythm section (and the "rhythm guitar") makes me smile so hard that I almost stop hearing the retarded lyrics and the really expensive suits they wore when they recorded the song.
Yes, Paul Banks is 95 percent of the time a
ham. Yes, Carlos D once said that he "can't respect a man who doesn't know how to dress" or something. Yes, their videos are awful. But until
Antics came out, Interpol was one of my favorite bands of this decade.
Basically,
Piero Scaruffi, in a review of Turn on the Bright Lights, wrote: Throughout the album, the band abuses cliches from the Velvet Underground and the REM, but, when the results are so enchanting, even the abuse is a welcome practice.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 9:22 pm
by cervixFORaHEart_Archive
you will never convince these people that they arnt too cool to like a band like interpol.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 9:31 pm
by ctrl-s_Archive
Everyone is too cool to like a band like Interpol, whether they realize it or not. Interpol's smoothed-out post-consumer recycled material content is too high. I could deal with the suits and hair if they had anything interesting going on.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 9:53 pm
by glynnisjohns_Archive
Get dog costumes wrote:In particular, the bass playing on "Obstacle 1" is awesome. Every time I hear this song, the rhythm section (and the "rhythm guitar") makes me smile so hard that I almost stop hearing the retarded lyrics and the really expensive suits they wore when they recorded the song.
This statement is very true. I can't seem to get into that newer album.
Which bothers me not a bit.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 12:56 am
by AAAAAAAARGH_Archive
ctrl-s wrote:I will confess to having liked the song "PDA" for a while a few years ago, mostly for the long outro which is pretty cool in its jangly derivative way. Apart from that, Krap, for all the reasons cited here and for having extra-terrible lyrics.
What a ridiculous fucking statement. "I admit I like this song, but here are 10 reasons why I actually DON'T like it _that_ much."
The first Interpol album is REALLY good. I love Steve Albini and Dave Yow and Joy Division and Sonic Youth and The Fall and all the other "required listening" bands for this forum and don't understand the basis about half of the responses in this thread. You should never have to excuse yourself for liking a song, or prove that even though you like it you think the guys involved in making it are assholes.
Of course Interpol is questionable in their fashion choices and self-promotion. Everyone knows that. But that first record isn't "100% crap" and the perception that it isn't even listenable sounds like complete hipster bullshit to me -- even if it doesn't do anything for you, there's no way it could or should be lumped in with Franz Ferdinand and the Killers and all those hack acts. The difference being that at least Interpol is trying to make good music.
(pretend I posted this before the 2nd lp came out because it was horrible and actually did tread in franz ferdinand/killers territory)
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:02 am
by ctrl-s_Archive
I didn't mention ANY reasons for not liking the song. The dislikeable aspects of Interpol's music and presentation considered as a whole have already been exhaustively covered. There is just so much better stuff to listen to that it's kind of annoying to see this kind of thing get so much recognition.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:08 am
by AAAAAAAARGH_Archive
I guess that's reasonable. But I also dont pay attention to Pitchfork or any of that shit at all so I could see getting more irritated by them if I heard they were BRILLIANT all the time or whatever they're thought of now. Despite how much I like Bright Lights I'll be the first to admit it's basically a mopey derivative mix between Echo and Television.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:11 am
by Bradley R Weissenberger_Archive
andteater wrote:i like [interpol] a whole lot more than i like joy division.
I note this comment for the record.
gio wrote:Over a week ago, [andteater] said he was 99.9% sure that our wednesday baseball game would be cancelled.
This sounds more prayer than prediction.
Band: Interpol
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 3:11 am
by Ally In Exile_Archive
Interpol's music is patently trivial.
they are to Joy Division what Baraka is to Koyaanisqatsi (or
Go! Go! Go!, for that matter).
CRAP, and that's putting it charitably.