I try to always see this stuff in practical terms, so I know how best to apply it. Regarding sample rate: How high can we hear? I have done some tests using a sine generator in the analog domain (hard wired to my speakers; K & H 0300Ds) and in my environment, with my ears, I can hear very faintl...

neemer wrote:It's called "fucking analog."

Yea, and unless you want to sound like ass, it is 'fucking expensive' to go 100% analog.

I consider our studio 20% digital, and that 20% accounts for at least a $100,000 analog investment.

We use PT like a RADAR with no plugins (except for occasional Massenberg and URS EQs in conjunction with outboard API EQ). This system is in use 14 hours a day, 6 days a week and in 2 years of use, there have been half a dozen incidents of frustration. I sum PT in analog and print mixes to 1" 2 trac...

And then there's 24/96kHz. Have you HEARD that? The faster the sampling rates, and then more complex the digital word (the bit depth) the more accurate recordings will be. This is pure misinformation. On high end converters, the difference between 44 khz and 96 khz is minimal. It is prosumer conver...