Search found 13 matches

Band: Jawbox Jawbox

1009 wrote:I'm in the minority, but I'd rank the s/t above the rest. I know the recording is bad, but the parts on that record are just beautifully intricate.+1 I love the s/t.

Band: Phish Phish?

The final Hollywood Bowl episode of Analyze Phish came out yesterday and had some doozie moments/revelations. Surprising arcs for both hosts. haha That podcast is by far the best thing about that silly band. I'm sad it's over.

Band: Jawbox Jawbox

morespaceecho wrote:you should check out his first post-jawbox band, the up on in. some really entertaining drumming. zach is interesting to me because his style is kind of rigid...sort of straight up and down...and yet he plays with more feeling than 95% of all drummers. i've been lucky to record h...

Band: Jawbox Jawbox

I've listened to the s/t since the 90's and even caught them on that last tour, and I still have no idea what their drummer is doing most of the time. On the record, it sounds like he has four arms. He finds these spots in the songs to insert a random tom or china hit that are so counterintuitive, b...

Band: Jawbox Jawbox

morespaceecho wrote:you should check out his first post-jawbox band, the up on in. some really entertaining drumming. zach is interesting to me because his style is kind of rigid...sort of straight up and down...and yet he plays with more feeling than 95% of all drummers. i've been lucky to record h...

Band: Phish Phish?

Andrew. wrote:cmay wrote:In case anyone missed it, Analyze Phish was a great 4-part podcast in which TV writer/comedian Harris Wittels tries (very unsuccessfully) to convince Scott Aukerman that Phish is actually good. The fourth episode consists of them seeing Phish live in NYC, and is essentially ...

Band: Phish Phish?

In case anyone missed it, Analyze Phish was a great 4-part podcast in which TV writer/comedian Harris Wittels tries (very unsuccessfully) to convince Scott Aukerman that Phish is actually good. The fourth episode consists of them seeing Phish live in NYC, and is essentially Aukerman taking as many d...

Go to advanced search