never heard of 'em, some of the posters were beautiful.

Oh Yeah, and makes Bukowski look like Bukowski.

I don't think he was the greatest but actively disliking him I think is glaringly pretentious since his writing is so quickly recognizable as at least very good solid reading. As opposed to say like Faulkner where your'e always like wait a second is this shit anygood ,uh... YES! err. wha? But yeah, ...

what's the point of this post? o.k., you don't like metal. i bet i could not like alot of the music you listen to. i could say (hypothetically) "all classical is shit, but i won't elaborate at all as to why". but then again, what's the fucking point. You want me to elaborate as to why metal should ...

[quote="goosman"] The Round Sound, Vol 1: (sounds of radial airplane engines) This sounds cool, especially to cut up and overlap and just generally fuck around with. As for good references I think there is already a thread on this but I don't think it was very extensive, I remember people ...

pitchfork really seems to drive people crazy, I dig em, I think they are not afraid to call a shit record shite not crap Yeah, they're also not afraid to give shit albums 10 and 10 albums shit, usually the former being the case. If they do ever have a decent review it's usually a guest writer.Yeah ...

Contains some of the most pretentious reviews ever written. Crap. If you mean prentious in the sense that they pretend to have insight into the essence of good music why is it that critics always like bands that have ugly album covers and are the best version of the worst shit and Loudon Wainwright...

Go to donfanallero.com, these guys seem very dedicated to tracking every musical endeavor the ex-don guys are involved with.