abcgroupdocumentation wrote:In the same way, certain articles, threads, or books are simply not worth my time.

You can tell by their covers.

...when you engage someone on a topic, it's often considered a courtesy to provide context for the discussion. How is putting the burden on the people who have already put effort into the discussion courteous? If you're not interested in the examination of details, then why should anybody assume yo...

The Hollow Earth theory is an old one. I remember reading somewhere that there was some Nazi scientist in the late '30s who promoted the idea that the surface of Earth was actually the inside if a hollow ball. He theorized that if you had a powerful enough telescope, you could look into the night s...

unarmedman wrote:Yeah, this discussion happened before (can't find it, tried but just can't). It wound up talking about quarter-tones and alternate tunings.

In that vein, Jeroen Thesseling.


And Demetrio Stratos for the Hell of it.

big_dave wrote:So he's free to be an arsehole as much as he likes, and he's free to present other people's opinions in the manner that he wants? Just through force of volume and repetition?

This is the internet. I wouldn't have it any other way.

You thought that 'individual' and 'conspiracy' are anthithetical. They are not. You are dumb, and also a troll. No, I thought you were using a narrow definition of "individual" appropriate to the discussion of individualism, not a broader definition. There is no definition of 'individual'...

Why didn't you quote it in context? Because I posted shortly after you did, so I assumed the context was still clear. You thought that 'individual' and 'conspiracy' are anthithetical. They are not. You are dumb, and also a troll. No, I thought you were using a narrow definition of "individual&...

I was under the impression that the context was individualism, not the broad meaning of individual as a person. Then why did you try and make the very dumb point that 'individual' is antithetical to conspiracy, if your objective was to discuss individualism and not the broad meaning of individual a...

I was under the impression that the context was individualism, not the broad meaning of individual as a person. Then why did you try and make the very dumb point that 'individual' is antithetical to conspiracy, if your objective was to discuss individualism and not the broad meaning of individual a...

I was under the impression that the context was individualism, not the broad meaning of individual as a person.