Chicago smoking ban

12
Marsupialized wrote:Fucking people. Hey, I don't like something...they should pass a law that says NOONE can do it.
Don't be a fucking pussy, people have [farted] in bars since way way way before you were born, deal with it.
I don't [fart] and I don't like coming home smelling like [farts] just like everyone else, but what kind of asshole would I be to insist everyone think and feel exactally like me? Some people enjoy [farting], lots of people, in fact....just because I wanna see a band, do I expect everyone to not [fart] because I showed up and I don't like it? No, I realize I am not the center of the fucking universe, when I go out in public I must deal with the public...I can sit in my house if I want everything arranged just how I like it. The last thing we need to do in this day and age is make the concert going experience more rigid and regulated and boring. Can we please not let the dorks win this ONE fucking time?
If you don't like going to [fart] filled bars it would seem to make sense you would stop going to [fart] filled bars.
If people [farting] is something that just really bugs you, why would you get a job in a place consistantly filled with people [farting]?
How about the owner of the bar can decide if he wants to let people [fart] inside his bar? Some bars can be [fart] filled, some can be [fart] free....people who like to [fart] can go to and work at [fart] bars and people who don't like it can go to and work at [fart] free bars....for some reason this isn't good enough for some people, and I don't understand why.


I have substituted some words, but hey I'm paraphrasing...
.

Chicago smoking ban

13
Marsupialized wrote:No, I realize I am not the center of the fucking universe, when I go out in public I must deal with the public...


why is it so easy to see it from one side and not the other? how about:

No, I realize I (smoker) am not the center of the fucking universe (and my actions affect those around me), when I go out in public I must deal with the public... (nonsmokers: who outnumber smokers)

just wondering?

i'm not saying it's a black and white case at all.
post honeymoon | bang! bang! | new black

Chicago smoking ban

14
They're trying to get this to happen in Milwaukee too. A friend of mine made the most valid point I could think of: if people really wanted non-smoking bars, wouldn't there already be some? Does the demand not dictate the supply?

That said, I have no problem with banning smoking in restaurants. It's a far different thing.
Hey. My name's Josh.
Image

Chicago smoking ban

16
wow, i'm really suprised by the rhetoric going on in here. it's not a black and white issue? sure if your basing it all on the PREFERENCES of smokers vs non-smokers but that doesn't seem like an issue worth VOTING ON... i'm not saying it's not a fine thing for someone to be able to walk into a bar and not smell like smoke... but seriously guys... let's be a little more alert.

you don't think the money (your money) that go into these laws are being misappropriated? i know in at least a few states, like mine, it isn't actually an issue of health -- once again, walk outside an check the air -- it's a matter of flow. soon begins the lotteries for rich businesses to buy 200,000 dollar smoking licenses... meanwhile a few more teachers don't get a raise cause state government funding has been routed to these bullshit initiatives.

so choppy, i agree with you... except for the restaurant thing. i dunno about yall but there were plenty of family non-smoking restaurants i could go to before these bans went into place... it was owner's perogative seeking to meet the demands of like-minded people... now that option no longer exists and it's a pity. i mean, what? are we trying to come off like some kinda utopia? as if health is some kind of concern in the u.s.?

oh and p.s.

....have nothing to do with the fact that playing shows and seeing shows is a much better experience when the venue is non-smoking.


is that a FACT?

Chicago smoking ban

17
Anthony J wrote:Smoke damages equipment. In a smoke-free venue, your equipment will last longer and require less frequent cleaning/replacement.


playing your equipment too loud can also damage it... and my ears. what's yr point? laws should be put in place for the sake of equipment owners?

Chicago smoking ban

18
kenoki wrote:
Anthony J wrote:Smoke damages equipment. In a smoke-free venue, your equipment will last longer and require less frequent cleaning/replacement.


playing your equipment too loud can also damage it... and my ears. what's yr point? laws should be put in place for the sake of equipment owners?


I said what I said and I'll leave it at that. I'll go to the place where the band I want to see is playing, regardless of smoking policy/law.
the Classical wrote:if you vote crap you are voting against Blue Oyster Cult. If you vote against Blue Oyster Cult yr a terrorist.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests