Justin from Queens wrote:What Evergreen record is it? Is it "Evergreen"?
Yes, it is the Evergreen record on Hi-Ball by the Louisville band (featuring the talented Mr. Walford) recorded by James Murphy in NY with the red-ish jelly and chrome thing cover. The cassettes came out the same moment as the records and CDs. It was a 'for the kids' decision. Just so 'the kids' know, I have about twelve 30-count boxes left over. The CDs are now all gone and I have a few more boxes of the LPs, all first (and only) pressing. Temporary Residence has reissued the CD this past year which includes the two tracks from the 'Pant's Off" 7" (also was a Hi-Ball release) as well.
PM me if you want to buy any of the cassettes. $5 each, box of 30 for $100.
Ike wrote:Might I also add another perspective? ...
Yes, good points Ike. That is a certain perspective I did not take into account in my other post. I was more speaking to what the original post asked regarding what recording with Steve meant in the eyes of labels, etc. It seemed more of a discussion about making music and recording a record and then selling it or at least paying for it.
That said, I agree with your points. When you are doing something because it is your passion and it is one of those things that you love to do, spending all your hard earned money on it is not foolish at all in my mind. You cannot make art with the idea of what you are getting out of it but rather what you are putting into it. If you do the other way around, you are probably making 'product', not 'art'.
I just think you have to be honest with yourself about it all and not pretend to be making art when you really are trying to make product. I do not have anything against 'product'. Making 'product' is fine. I don't have anything against selling 'art' as well. I just think you should not fool yourself about which you are doing. That was my point.