Pitchfork?

CRAP
Total votes: 105 (80%)
NOT CRAP
Total votes: 26 (20%)
Total votes: 131

Website: Pitchfork

42
Christopher_Dragon wrote:
DrAwkward wrote:They did, however, give my band's first CD a pretty good review back in 2001.


You call being compared to Clinic a good review?


Eh, i paid more attention to the score, and the fact that the dude actually managed to work in some constructive suggestions for improving later recordings. And the part where he said we could "stand to be an important band" was nice too. Oddly enough, i've never seen that author do a single review since that one.

Also, i think i heard Clinic once, but don't remember much of it.
http://www.ifihadahifi.net
http://www.superstarcastic.com

Marsupialized wrote:Thank you so much for the pounding, it came in handy.

Website: Pitchfork

45
Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:
DrAwkward wrote:They did, however, give my band's first CD a pretty good review back in 2001.

Come on, DrAwkward. Good reviews are boring.

Let's hear some crazee shit about your band.


Ooohooo! I had not seen that thread before! Done and done, Bradley R. Weissenberger.
http://www.ifihadahifi.net
http://www.superstarcastic.com

Marsupialized wrote:Thank you so much for the pounding, it came in handy.

Website: Pitchfork

48
Christopher_Dragon wrote:
DrAwkward wrote:They did, however, give my band's first CD a pretty good review back in 2001.


You call being compared to Clinic a good review?


I love Clinic.
So, uh, I think I'm going to check your band out now.
Damn Pitchfork and their influence!
Next thing you know I'm going to become a Clap Your Hands fan.

So, Pitchfork annoys the hell out of me. That Radiohead review is a classic example of why. If one of your friends described a record that way you'd punch him in the nose, so why should Pitchfork get a break?

However, I've seen how they can be a very good influence on the young'uns. This cool 17 year old that I know gets most of his reccommendations from them instead of his friends. Anytime a teenager asks me about Autolux, Ambulance Ltd, Blonde Redhead, Kraftwerk, The Fall, Jobriath, and Yellow Magic Orchestra I take notice, whether I like all of those bands or not.

Crap, but with a 9.9 W/F

Website: Pitchfork

49
Pitchfork was really useful back when I was in college radio. Other than AMG, it was my go-to site for writing CD reviews. If it was something I wasn't that familiar with I could paraphrase their reviews some. Also, I could keep up to date with the latest from the arcade fire or the firey furnaces without actually having to listen to it. (After all, if I didn't and somebody asked me about it, I might lose cred) Now that I dont need to be up to date and I can listen to the cds I actually buy I don't check it that often. The last year or so the site has really gone downhill. Really Pitchfork, I don't care about the new Green Day or Gwen Stefani CD. If I wanted to read Spin I would go out and buy it. And I really don't know what their massive hard-on with shitty mainstream rap is all about. If you are going to write about mainstream rap from a serious, evenminded perspective(to show that you aren't all above it) you might as well write about something good like Big Tymers rather than 50 Cent. I don't understand why some mainstrem rap is OK to review and other stuff is not. Also, Bloc Party, Franz Ferdinand, and the Killers suck, Pitchfork. Don't write about them. See my comment about Spin magazine from before. You guys used to not cover all this mainstream crap. Sheesh, I feel a lot better now.

Website: Pitchfork

50
I'm sorry; i realize that at this point bitching about Pitchfork being self-absorbed sanctimonious douchebags is like bitching about the sun being hot in July, but this New Radiant Storm King (who i'm neutral on, really) review from today set me off. I'm sorry, i'm sorry, i'm sorry. I should just avoid reading this shit, but i can't stop. To this degree, the terrorists have won.

Zach Baron wrote:An unhappy late-1990s memory of mine consists of Giovanni Ribisi's pants down, full junk out in the non-remake remake, SubUrbia: no Vandals or TSOL, just swinging balls to period-piece Decline-of-Western-Indie-Rock mood-setting. That movie and soundtrack were stillbirths-- angst-doses for kids who'd already been getting them on screen and stereo for six or seven years-- and even my young self sensed something slacker was dying. New Radiant Storm King's The Steady Hand arrives then as a super-oddity: call it spirit of spiritless '97, or SubUrbia soundtrack redux. Their "Accountant of the Year" is Girls Against Boys' "Bulletproof Cupid"; "Fighting off the Pricks" is Superchunk's "Does Your Hometown Care?"; "Yardsale Legacy" gets to be Sonic Youth's "Sunday" of course; even "From a Roof" could be the Butthole Surfers' "Human Cannonball".

That that kind of major-labelled indie rock was already choking itself to death circa then-- same for the last vestiges of anything called "college rock." Regardless, New Radiant Storm King's website still reads as elegy for Nirvana magic-markered flyers and Homestead Records. We learn about gigs with Sebadoh and GBV, sleeping over at the Unwound house, and they even offer up a depressing late vestige of the Year-Punk-Broke contract boom: either a very large or very small $45,000 from Grass records, a former Dutch East India subsidiary. It gets worse. Try a '97 tour with "it's good to be the king"-era Creed, then shelved contracts, unreturned phone calls, and inevitable indie oblivion.

I did college radio in Massachusetts, which meant I was knee-deep in NRSK detritus. They had splits with Silver Jews, Polvo, GBV; everyone who followed '90s rock ended up with at least a compilation song; like most people I played the flip of those records, or other songs off the comps, but they were old familiars. Who knew they still breathed?

But also, why? Their buzz is now commonly spun as "near miss," but that's just B-list fate. My friend Joshua had a high school (circa 1993) fling with Rival Time's "Phonecall", a college love-letter/acid-in-the-woods slacker paean to a girl with "brand new glasses." Stack that against The Steady Hand's 2006 pseudo-social commentary "Accountant of the Year": "I think I'll go in early today/ I think I'll catch an earlier train/ I'm going to make my quota today." I'll take the girl, thanks guys, and not just because my grandfather was an accountant.

Ditto on the minefield truisms of "Fighting off the Pricks": emo-by-numbers "every atom of my being beckons me to keep on staying here," complete with falsetto chorus, and sweeping dual guitars (one vaguely jangling lead, the other the epic rhythm). College crushes are cute but at least a couple of these dudes ought to married by now, no?

We should root for the underdog though, and unreconstructed '93 indie is definitely that. Their rallying cry, for a guy looking pretty hard for one, wasn't too hard to find on The Steady Hand. "Anthymn", a vaguely Foo Fighters rip, has the fist-pump chorus and the low-dynamic bridge to charm you back, or make you still believe in shiny happy half-rock. Until, that is, you realize what you're shouting along to: "Reckonings of who you should have been/ Are by comparison/ Sure of who you were 10 years ago/ Where does a decade go?"


Let's see...for a website that heaps accolades on bands that basically are aping late 70s/early 80s post-punk by the numbers (Hi, The Rapture), i find it really hilarious that one of their reviewers is taking a 90s indie-rock band to task for still sounding like 90s indie-rock in 2006, especially in light of the (well-deserved) blowjobs the site doles out for The (amazing, incredible) Wrens on a regular basis. *twitch*
http://www.ifihadahifi.net
http://www.superstarcastic.com

Marsupialized wrote:Thank you so much for the pounding, it came in handy.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests