Pitchfork fest

21
jayryan wrote:FYI: the fest we went to last year, called 'intonation festival', is being run by the same people / organizers / location under the name 'pitchfork music festival' this year. this is due to a parting of ways between the organizers and the company which technically owns the intonation name.

to confuse things, the legal owners of the 'intonation' name will be having an intonatiuon festival this year, but the organizers & booking people are all different.

also: keep in mind that lollapalooza has 130 bands playing in grant park in three days. this is frightening. there are a couple good bands in there, too.


This sounds like the ramblings of a conformist outsider.

Pitchfork fest

22
j_harvey wrote:
jayryan wrote:FYI: the fest we went to last year, called 'intonation festival', is being run by the same people / organizers / location under the name 'pitchfork music festival' this year. this is due to a parting of ways between the organizers and the company which technically owns the intonation name.

to confuse things, the legal owners of the 'intonation' name will be having an intonatiuon festival this year, but the organizers & booking people are all different.

also: keep in mind that lollapalooza has 130 bands playing in grant park in three days. this is frightening. there are a couple good bands in there, too.


This sounds like the ramblings of a conformist outsider.


you should see his billboards:
Image


he's literally Conforming......Outside!



makes me want to up-chuck on Taylor St.




Faiz
kerble is right.

Pitchfork fest

23
electrons wrote:I went last year. I had a great time.


I went last year with Jet (don't make fun of her, it wasn't her idea) in the middle of my crazy summer roadtrip. We only went for one day. We stayed for a while but left early.

It was alright. Where else are ya gonna see Magnolia Electric Co., Pelican and Four Tet in the same day?

My neck and arms got super burnt. It was about 107, if I remember incorrectly.

the enf

Pitchfork fest

24
Eksvplot wrote:pitchfork i don't care for. but i'll admit i dislike them just a little less after hearing mr. whiney white stripes man (who can't act his way out of a paper bag) recently dissed them. too bad he didn't have the guts to diss the Onion as well.


I missed this -- what did he say? A brat dissing a bunch of brats...

Pitchfork fest

28
BadComrade wrote:I think what it comes down to is that I just hate "scenes". I'm not saying that my point of view should be the norm here... that's why I asked if people were going and what they thought of it.

Fests like this one / Lollapalooza / etc just seem to use peoples taste in music to create these large scenster events, so they can make money. Pitchfork are going to make a -lot- of money doing this, right? I mean, I might think a little differently of this kind of thing if they did it in a "non-profit" kind of way, yet made sure that the bands all got paid well, etc. It just seems like a big scam. To me, paying to get in to a fest like this one is like paying $20 to get in to a dance club. The people that pay to get in to those places do so because they want to feel like they're part of some "select group" of people, and they make the club owners rich in the process. I don't view regular rock club shows as being in the same vein as these fests, because 3 bands playing a show is a smaller, more focused thing. When you book a fest that has multiple stages, and a wide variety of bands that almost no one is going to like more than 25% of, it just seems like the promoter is casting a large net out to try and "catch" as many people as he can, so he can take their money from them, and make them feel like they are part of "something really cool and special" in the process.

I don't have a soul.


I think you make an excellent point...

...You don't have a soul (see what I did there?).

I also think if you asked the people who are going to the pitchfork festival if they hate "scenes" they would agree. I just like to think of 'scene' as a stupid, useless term that would most likely be reified by every person you ask. Yeah, everyone hates "scenes" and "hipsters," but everyone fits into those categories to a degree, anyway, whether they want to or not.

If there were enough bands playing that I would want to see, it makes sense to pay $20 to see them instead of $8-$15 for each at different times and in different venues. I don't hate Pitchfork enough to deprive myself of good music, but I do recognize the business mentality that you so eloquently pointed out, and I really disrespect that.


I too, have no soul. I have negative soul.

Pitchfork fest

29
my new sunglasses are the best. they perfectly foil my large, unmistakably european nose. i love wearing them with my new grey field jacket. i even look like what i am now. so deliberate, and yet sensible all the same. i suppose this is part of becoming an adult.

my new sunglasses are stylish but in a nonchalant sort of way. i got a lot of double takes on the u-bahn. every now and then one couldn't help but wonder, "who is that? why are my eyes drawn to him? is it the sunglasses alone or what lies beneath them that intrigues me?"

that being said, a prostitute from oranienberger tor told me i had beautiful eyes and asked why i would wear sunglasses to hide them. i told her that i feel a little too exposed sometimes, that it felt soothing to be a little opaque for a change. (keep in mind i was drinking a rum and coke, and i almost never have soda.)

i think mr. red stripe and cigarettes should've left it to the pros and just quoted kierkegaard: "the critic resembles the poet to a hair; he only lacks the anguish in his heart and the music upon his lips."

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests