hip priest wrote:I am thoroughly shocked at how this vote is going.

Crap.

i concur with both.

dfa1979 is a shit poor excuse for "noise rock" or whatever it was marketed as.

crap in the most.

My god, does anything with fuzz bass qualify as noise rock these days?

C'mon, even a cursory listen would tell you that it's got jack shit to do with Noise. It's distortion, as used on guitar, as used in rock. Noise would imply that they were using non-tonal non-percussion sounds as a musical tool. They're just making poppish-dance songs with the heavy fucking bass and the crazed edge.

Noise rock? Pssh.

Antero wrote:C'mon, even a cursory listen would tell you that it's got jack shit to do with Noise.

yes precisely. before i heard it, i was told it was a kindof dancy band with a lot of noise elements.

maybe that's why i put it down so fast.. i wanted noise. they gave none.

the Classical wrote:The music is just so boring and bland, I can hardly get up enough ire to even vote crap, but I will.

crap

This man said it.

translation: "if nobody else in the world knew about them i would think theyre not crap, but too many people know and like them so i am forced to act like theyre crap and say they are "boring" "noise rock"...."

That "Romantic Rights" song still holds up well. I don't think I'll ever not enjoy it.

I still listen to this one regularly and enjoy the hell out of it every time.

NC WF 0

I tried to.

Crap

Vacuous, but still enjoyable.

crap.