One thing I would like to add to the court update is that the Breen, JS's defense attorney, has twice referenced "the families" for his own benefit. It is driving me up a wall. He literally makes a physical motion our way as he does it. He has done this twice in order to extend the time that we are scheduled to arrive at court. Breen would like to start the proceedings later (which may be a mute point as the prisoner "bus" arrives whenever it arrives) yet he has now twice asked for the judge to delay the time "we" need to be there. He references us as if we had had some conversation about it. It really almost appears as if he is representing "our" wishes. He has told the court that he knows that the families have to drive in from the city and a later start time would be a good thing for all of us.
Unless it starts after 2pm it doesn't affect my grumpy mood and everyone else has a day job; the later it starts the worse it is for most everyone else. This must read petty, but I might crack him in the back of his head if he references "us" in that way again. I don't even want to hear him say Michael, Doug or John's names let alone reference what would be "good for us" as if no. 1 he represents "us" and no. 2 as if it were true.
aaaaaahhhhh.
Mr Chimp does such an excellent job at keeping a record of all of this. I really shouldn't write anything. It is just pent up anger.
Vick- call me and tell me to shut up.
Thanks for letting me vent.
Remembering Michael, Doug, and John (was: not again)
351looking forward to new projects by peter sotos, dr kay redfield jamison, lauren weedman, daido moriyama, loretta lux, jack mcbrayer, kim deal, rory kennedy, alex prager, jen davis, bracha l ettinger, martha plimpton, nina nastasia, matt besser