49
by alex maiolo_Archive
It's funny, the newbies tend to vote Nirvana, and the long(er) time posters/old farts tend to pick Fugazi.
It was cool that Nirvana did well for themselves playing music that was actually good. I never thought it would happen. It was extra cool that they name dropped bands like Flipper and The Meat Puppets. Maybe it sold some records for some under appreciated bands. I found Kurt to be genuinely humble when it came to that sort of thing.
Pat Smear got a new job out of it.
The bad news is that Nirvana breaking ultimately gave us some of the shittiest music ever spewed forth from the record industry: Creed, Stone Temple Pilots, and the legions of bands that "found their true sound," post-Nirvana, like Live. All of those bands with singers who were "yarlers," as my friend Jenny says.
"That guy? He just yarls, like he's in Alice in Chains or something."
Plus, I think they were a "gateway" for even shittier stuff like rap/metal hybrid bands - Korn, Limp Bizkit, Shrimp Bazket, or whatever.
The so-called "punk revolution" is over and the industry won yet again.
I loved Nirvana, but I have to give it to Ian/Fugazi. Without him, his mates and both of his bands, it's very possible there would have been no Nirvana. They helped to write and spread the DIY gospel as much as anyone. Clearly that gospel inspired Kurt, Chad, Jason, Kris and Dave to get up off of their asses to do it. Obviously I don't know for sure, but my guess is that Ian continues to work outside of the mainstream industry because he knows where it gets people who become "successful." He's had the offers, but he seems to make decisions that keep his life simple and therefore happy.
-A