Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote:
The pot calling the kettle black. One idealogical nutbag to another. Ever heard of opposites attract?

Hey, moron-

Pot calling the kettle black translates to "matthew and CB are the same".

One idealogical[sic] nutbag to another translates to "matthew and CB are the same".

And then you say, "Ever heard of opposites attract?", which means what, matthew and CB are different, but we cohabitate in threads? Which we don't. matthew hunts me down for attention- I never think of him and will not reply to his posts again, which says what about the future validity of "opposites attract"?

Still ducking all the replies you left hanging in the Three Iraqs thread, too, wolfie? Go apologize some more for the war your Halliburton daddy profits from, or whatever multinational mercenary force he graduated to from military service.

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote: This forum has degenerated ad infinitum.

Since you fled for cover from the Three Iraqs thread on May 13th, you've made a grand total of five posts, and one of them was on Michael Fox- if you don't like the soup, cook some of your own, or take your lack of business elsewhere. Spare us the eulogies and violins.

clocker bob wrote:

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote:
The pot calling the kettle black. One idealogical nutbag to another. Ever heard of opposites attract?

Hey, moron-

Pot calling the kettle black translates to "matthew and CB are the same".

One idealogical[sic] nutbag to another translates to "matthew and CB are the same".

And then you say, "Ever heard of opposites attract?", which means what, matthew and CB are different, but we cohabitate in threads? Which we don't. matthew hunts me down for attention- I never think of him and will not reply to his posts again, which says what about the future validity of "opposites attract"?

Still ducking all the replies you left hanging in the Three Iraqs thread, too, wolfie? Go apologize some more for the war your Halliburton daddy profits from, or whatever multinational mercenary force he graduated to from military service.

Bob,

Since I was being sarcastic earlier and you have resorted to name calling, I will have to do the same. Let me clarify it for you. Both you and Matthew are opposites in terms of your political persuasions but vastly similiar in terms of your fervent, extremist rants. That is what I mean't by "the opposites attract" YOU "moron".

As for the shameless baiting of my father, I already clarified my position on the current Iraq situation. You on the other hand, are a spineless runt with no knowledge of what you are talking about. Also don't comment on my father when you don't know him. His accomplishments far outweight anything you will ever achieve. You are a grease spot, a clock punching office drone, an insignificant speck on the microsope. You are not currently in the military nor a veteran. You aren't a political figure nor an educator. Nothing but another guy with an "opinion" reduced to tedious ranting on an internet message board. Nothing against you personally but don't slander my father, asshole. I'm through with this now.

clocker bob wrote:

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote: This forum has degenerated ad infinitum.

Since you fled for cover from the Three Iraqs thread on May 13th, you've made a grand total of five posts, and one of them was on Michael Fox- if you don't like the soup, cook some of your own, or take your lack of business elsewhere. Spare us the eulogies and violins.

Sorry, busy with my own life and I can't be bothered to appear here 24/7.

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote:As for the shameless baiting of my father, I already clarified my position on the current Iraq situation.

No, you didn't, as the final page of the Three Iraqs thread illustrates- your clarification is missing.

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote:Nothing against you personally but don't slander my father, asshole. I'm through with this now.

I make my points any way that I choose, and if you have a problem with that, I'll give you exact directions to my block in Chicago by plane, train or automobile. You don't even understand what rights the US military is sworn to protect if you think only military or ex-military people are allowed to criticize our foreign policy. They work for internet cranks, too- that's what civilian control of the military means.

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote:Since I was being sarcastic earlier and you have resorted to name calling, I will have to do the same.

I resorted to name calling? "Idealogical nutbag" came first in this thread. I responded. Your original post does not qualify as sarcasm, either- you just flushed your mental cache of similar colloquialisms because you don't have real arguments to offer, sarcastic or otherwise.

Hour_of_the_Wolf wrote:Sorry, busy with my own life and I can't be bothered to appear here 24/7.

So you are too busy to contribute regularly but you lurk often enough to track the alleged decline in quality? I don't complain about problems and then apologize for being too busy to make changes. I don't walk by restaurants that served me a bad meal and occasionally poke my head through the door, yelling, "Hey, your food sucks!". I go elsewhere and eventually forget the first place ever existed.

kerble wrote:

To arms!

Oh, this is going to be so much fun.

matthew wrote:I am quite convinced from just living my life that John Lennon's song "Imagine" is indirectly responsible for alot of hedonism and otherwise madness in this world today......of course it's a song

Chapter Two wrote:
Oh, this is going to be so much fun.

C2, does your fatwah against Matthew extend to Crap / Not Crap? He's lavishing praise on Ann Coulter over there. I badly want in, only briefly.