endofanera wrote:Chapter Two wrote:I don't know if monogamy is possible without doing some weird damage to yourself emotionally. It takes strength to maintain such a state, a strength that is definitely admirable, but I think the best possible state of affairs is some kind of emotional monogamy, like you know the two of you work well together, love being with each other, etcetera, but that you're human and therefore going to want to fuck a lot of people in your life, as is natural. Otherwise: timebomb.
I'd like to think monogamy can work and be a good thing, but I'd like to think all sorts of things. I'd rather think what is true.
This idea is dependent on the highly suspect notion that sex without emotion is possible or if it is, that it's even desireable.
I contend that sex without emotion, while possible, is damaging to those who engage in it regularly and as a matter of course -- far more damaging than this odd monogamy-time-bomb damage youre suggesting takes place, which Ive yet to experience.
I also contend that sex sans emotion is simply subpar to sex with emotion, and that emotions are an inevitable outcome of sex sans emotion if it continues long enough. Then youre just playing chicken with your emotions. Hardly healthy.
If we're talking about "what is true," then I think this is closer to the mark than the fiction youve invented.Chapter Two wrote:Chapter Two wrote:I've also got myself in quite a bit of trouble here and there for not having the required moral perspective to stay away from other people's girlfriends. This is something I have had to learn not to do, not because it is morally wrong, but because it gets me in the shit. A rat can live through shit but probably would prefer not to.
I find it hard sometimes to be in the company of couples and not reflect on this idea they've both got of what it is they're holding to. It then becomes interesting to play with that.
I'm sorry everybody, this is going to sound very bad of me, but life just hasn't demonstrated otherwise than that one on one relationships are a left over idea from a more religious and thus warped psychological mindset.
But hey, good luck.
Dont try to play the "monogamy is outdated" card to make your entirely reprehensible behavior acceptable or cloak it in a "progressive" costume.
You are a predator. You are attempting to hurt those around you for your own selfish ends, whether that's to prove a point to yourself about the foolishness of monogamy, to prove your own attractiveness and superiority, or just to get some sex only you could say.
Monogamous relationships bring those who are in them great joy, but that doesnt make even the healthiest of them unassailable. The relationship's health, value, and meaning, and the ability of the individuals in them to withstand temptation or the relationship's ability to outlive assults on its integrity are two very different things. You are not watching relationships dissolve because they are outdated; you are actively engaging in bringing about their failure. That is, simply put, a dick move (yeah, a pun -- I'm not smiling) and it is "morally wrong," despite any of your assertions to the contrary. Since Im forced to assume you arent fucking your "friends'" girlfriends in front of them and with everyone's consent, then it's clear to me that you are going out of your way to violate the trust of both of your friends when you fuck one of them. You are a lying bastard if you do this.
I just have to look at this one more time:Chapter Two wrote:It then becomes interesting to play with that.
Wow. What a "fuck you" to your friends.
I think the more amazing thing isnt that youre single, but that you have any friends at all.
PS-- Get some therapy. Seriously. Youre fucking up.
EA Hall of Fame
51i like this one: