Earwicker wrote:Now fuck off!
[edit: re-reading all his posts - admitting here that I called the guy an anti-Semite,
then edited it away - i agree that it was dangerous rhetoric.]
K. I agree we should have gladiator games to determine world policy.
The kill em all line, even in just, is dangerous rhetoric at best.
I gotta say, it seems like you are advocating the destruction of Israel. Hard
to tell, but stuff like this, cryptic as it is, points me in that direction:
Earwicker wrote:he's a dreamer
but he's not the only one
OK. I'm going to say that I personally feel going back to the 67 border is
suicide for Israel. That will probably indicate how I feel about the region
as a whole. Sure, most countries have recognized Israel as a State, however
a few million people massed around the border haven't.
Again, you like to interject this dangerous rhetoric, and it seems to tickle
you a bit:
Earwicker wrote:roberto wrote:scott wrote:It's times like this I wish the US would just nuke Israel and put an end to all this bullshit.
I don't understand how comments like this can be tolerated and further more applauded by some on this forum.
Imagine the uproar of outrage if someone suggested that
The US nuked Palestine or Lebanon.... ‘to end all the bullshit’
In an otherwise intelligent and fair discussion, im surprised no one raised an eyebrow at such an ignorant, stupid and racist comment....
Well I suggested Israel could kill all the Arabs to solve the problem.
Levels it out a bit.
Carry on.
You ask what people would do if they were Israel. Kinda smells like chum
to me. I'm note sure trolling for fire on a topic like this is such a good idea,
so I'm going to promptly apologize for doing it myself.
Man, I'm having probs here. You're kinda cryptic, and believe me, I know
cryptic (just read my posts). Stuff like this:
Earwicker wrote:And to your man going on about how hard the Israelis are...true...but the Jewish people were subjugated by Rome in that area almost two thousand years ago. Against all the odds, after all those years, they got 'their' land back. Persistence and blind faith can go a long way.
The Arab resistance learnt an awful lot (including some of its methods) from the Zionists.
It looks like you are actually saying you believe the 67 border rap, but then
why would you put
their in quotes?
I also agree that using 0.999' instead of 1 smacks of d-bag.
You got a sweet tooth for hate alright, it might seem like slap-stick to you,
but I assure you it isn't:
Earwicker wrote:I don't know about anyone else around here but i find this picture:
Most amusing.
Especially as it looks like he's pointing.
'Get orrf my laaand!'
am i a bad person?
Yeah, I'm starting to think maybe you are.
Now I guess it's time for me to be the bad guy. Religion, imo, is flat out bad.
Religion was science, it answered questions incorrectly. It's an approximation
of science. God's don't chariot around with the sun hitched to their ass.
Earwicker wrote:Jesus fucking Christ will people stop saying this!
America did not vote for Bush!!
Good to hear. Have hope for you now.
You didn't post this. This is an aside:
Mose Varty-Seppanen wrote:I thought that "X marks the spot" precision-guided ambulance hit the other day was a priceless piece of inhumanity.
I've seen this pick a million times, over a number of years. The guys claims
it's has some relevance to now, but the fucking pick comes from photo bucket.
This is the utter peak of dangerous rhetoric.
Are you saying that because Jews could only say handle money and make
cloths back in the day, that it's a perfectly good reason why a majority of the
banking industry and clothier industry is Jewish? Not getting your point, so
I gotta ask.
Do you claim to pick a side or not? It seems like you are presenting yourself
as a neutral party, but then you post nothing but pics like the ones i've quoted,
or articles like this:
Earwicker wrote:Excellent article detailing the bias in the British Media regarding the current massacre.
http://www.medialens.org/alerts/index.phpYou will of course be wanting to spit out your own teeth after reading it.
Unless you've 'picked the side' of the more effective civilian massacreing nation, of course. Then you'll humming to yourself with satisfaction.
Here you present a catch 22 scenario:
Earwicker wrote:If they just concentrated on where hizbullah were firing the rockets from, groovy, but no - they bomb residential areas, fleeing evacuees (that they told to evacuate) and UN posts - killing UN soldiers (can you imagine if Iran did this?)
You present the two as if they're mutually exclusive. They're not.
More reckless rhetoric:
Earwicker wrote:I'll add to that. If you support the Israeli bombardment of civilian areas you are fucking scum.
K. I'm gunna stop right here. You are obviously trying to appear impartial,
but you have an agenda. I'll admit; anti-Semite is not what you are, but
you got something going on there that's about as close as 0.999' to 1.
And yeah, I'll tell you, I picked a side! I think it's easy to see that I think
1 is larger then 0.999' and therefore a completely different number!
Chapter Two wrote:Ubertwat.
Clever!
