betty wrote: I did not mean to infer that you are a group of money-grubbers, only that the general state of the bar circuit relies heavily on alcohol sales at live shows to insure that everybody involved in the production gets paid and the club maybe makes a profit on the event.
Do you know why they (OLCC) went back on the agreement to allow an all ages show at Berbati's?
I truly do appreciate the effort you all put into trying to hold an all ages show and I hope that you will try again some day in our neck of the woods.
I know what you're saying. And thanks for the kind words.
The clubs do make most of their money from the bar. That's true. But it's not like people are being forced to drink. Folks enjoy having a drink while listening to a band.
I don't think the bars started selling liquor to help pay the bills when they hold rock shows. Bars started having entertainment to get people in there to drink. At many of the places we play, the bar is the primary focus of the business. Not the music.
It's a good trade off (except for the bummer of not being allowed in if under 21). As you noted, without the liquor sales to pay the expenses of running the venue it would be difficult to generate enough money at the door at a reasonable ticket price to make it worth a touring band's while.
All ages shows without liquor have to have higher ticket prices or bands that are willing to play for less money than they could make at a club selling the booze. I guess this is all pretty obvious and I'm restating what you've already said.
As for the Oregon Liquor Commission's decision...we really don't know exactly what went on. We were told that it had something to do with a recent series of shootings in that area....maybe trying to keep the kids out of harm's way?
best,
Bob