abcgroupdocumentation wrote:so now that you know that Jack is not bourbon, you should also know that it's not good.
Drink George Dickel instead...the Select bottle is where it's at...about $32 a bottle and a real stand out.
do a blind taste test of any Dickel product vs. Jack and you'll nail the Dickel every time.
Tennessee whiskey is bourbon under the above-cited regulation. Throughout Jack's history, it has litigated in courts and lobbied Congress to receive distinction for its marketable uniqueness. In fact, some of its landmark litigation has been against "bourbon" producers from Kentucky who market their products for using the same charcoal filtration technique as Jack. Jack lost those cases. And that was four decades ago. And former distinctions in the federal statutes no longer exist. And you can read the regulation yourself. Note that bourbon made in Tennessee is technically Tennessee whiskey under the law. Sayin'. Obviously, it would be illegal for a Kentucky bourbon producer to call its product Tennessee whiskey, just as it would be illegal for a Virginia bourbon producer to call its product Kentucky bourbon. Any present-day defintional distinction between bourbon and Tennessee whiskey is nominal and based on local popular-cultural traditions. For example, because bourbon is an American invention under domestic and international law, often Tennessee whiskey is mentioned alongside the term
bourbon in international trade agreements. This is probably as much proof as anything of the true identity of Tennessee whiskey.