5
by Maurice_Archive
It depends on your definitions of "bad" and "worst." For example, I once played a show to zero people. It was an art installation thing that was supposed to be a week long, and nobody was in the building except for other artists, busy working on their rooms. Occasionally they'd stop by and we'd talk, but there wasn't any audience. Still, I had a good time, and ultimately was paid $10 for participating in the event. It was my first paying gig.
So by some people's estimations, this would have been a bad show, but it actually went rather well.
What I think of as my worst-ever gig was at the execrable CB's 313 Gallery, the supposedly freeform, alternative, experimental space operated by a certain club in NY which people who haven't played there tend to think of rather too highly. Once again I had essentially no audience, but a number of factors combined to make for a particularly bad experience. 1) No one else on the bill stuck around to listen to my set, although I sat through theirs. 2) I recorded myself, a fact which was observed by the staff, who made an effort to shake me down for a "recording fee" they'd not mentioned in advance. 3) The no audience factor did bug me this time, due to the above, particularly that the other bands didn't hang around. If I'm playing to no audience, I'd think that I'd at least be able to play to my peers, but not this time. Also, they sucked.
So that was a bad experience. Up until that time, I'd thought my worst show experience was at the Lemp in St. Louis, but at least there there was a (tiny) audience, and I did a set good enough that I later released it.