TobiasTheCommie wrote:clocker bob wrote: TTC, what is the cause of autism? If you know it, why are they looking for it?
Ah, now you are asking me about something usefull, about time.
I explained that on page four. go there and search for "Etiology of autism".
Is that what you're referring to?
TTC on pg 4 wrote:In the recent years some of the myths regarding the etiology of autism have waned and been abandoned by the scientific community. Waned and been replaced with purely scientific causes.
Of course the research isn't complete yet, and there are probably more causes to be found in the future.
Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth. First you lead with the word 'myths' ( your opinion ), and then you state your
opinion that these 'myths' have been replaced with purely scientific causes.
TTC, that's a very broad term, and I hate to break this bad news to you, but you don't get to decide what gets placed into the myth category and what gets placed into the scientific causes category. Most people without an agenda like you would classify mercury poisoning as a potential scientific cause of neurological disorders, based on the fact that mercury poisoning is a
known cause of other neurological disorders. Are you claiming that an environmental cause is not a scientific cause?
Then, because you know that
the cause of autism has not been determined, you finish with this giant waffle:
TTC wrote:Of course the research isn't complete yet, and there are probably more causes to be found in the future.
Whoa there, TTC. Reads to me like a pretty clear statement of agreement with me: the cause of autism is an open question.
TTC, if Thimoseral is not a potential cause of neurological disorders, why was it removed from vaccines?