StevenMallory wrote:_Not to ruin anyone's good time, but some of these stories about the Empty Bottle are looking like the kind of material that would form the basis of a slander or libel lawsuit. Even if the stories are true, I would be careful about this stuff, people. :shock:
_By the way, wasn't this a thread about how awful the Metro is? The conspiracy theorist in me says that agents of the Metro are trying to steer this off topic in order to slam a smaller competitor. :wink:
I took a Journalism Law and Ethics class as required once, and so I can summon-up some of the language and pretend I'm pretty sure about this:
Slander is spoken defamation about a person (not a company) with malice, libel is written defamation (of a person) with malice, (intent to deceive or cast in a bad light where the writer is indifferent to the the truth or falsity of the statement).
In either case, there is no tort unless another person was able to hear or read the defamation, and can be reasonably expected to know who is being talked about specifically. Solitary utterances and writings are protected as thought. I can think what I like about the Metro, the Empty Bottle or any other shithole, and I can go into an empty room and curse their proprietors at the top of my lungs, but I am at risk if I identify individuals and tell lies about them.
In any case, truth is an absolute defense. This might be why the dude can get away with calling Bush a 12-foot reptilian monster without repercussion.
Oh, and also most people don't sue over defamation, and when they do it costs a fortune and they don't often win.
Fear of libel action did give us the lovely institutions of the Roman à Clef and the Victorian practice of silhouetting:
"Mr J--- N------ notable book-right for the E-------- A---- company, known to S--- C---- in the bus shelter on B------ Avenue, maintains that he is marrying, this Spring. Ho!