Minotaur029 wrote:
Gun control is silly. If you wanna kill somebody with a gun, you'll get one to do it with one way or another.
Ok, Charlton.
Obviously, you can't stop real criminals from getting guns, but some level of gun control could hopefully stop the type of heat of the moment killings that the proximity to guns exacerbates.
For example, road rage murders. I'm sure that guy wouldn't have murdered someone in front of Wrigley Field a couple of years ago in a traffic dispute if he hadn't been traveling with a gun. Yeah, he must have been really mad, but I doubt if there were no gun available that he would have beaten them to death with a baseball bat or stabbed them to death or anything.
For example, domestic disputes. People kill their partners in domestic disputes often and not always with guns, but I'm sure that some of these would be avoided if there were no guns in the house at the time. Again, I doubt if all of these circumstances would have ended in a death by strangulation or whatever.
A total ban isn't necessary. Hunting, etc. is fine. But if guns are harder to obtain, maybe every random idiot won't have them and allow themselves the possiblilty to make terrible heat of the moment decisions.
Rotten Tanx wrote: every time I watch Die Hard (6am and 8pm, mon to sat)...