Brinkman wrote:If I inherit my grandfather's unplayable copy of a Skip James 78, does that mean I deserve a mp3 of all those tracks from a remastered digital transfer for free? Not really. Honestly though, it's music I have no problem paying for.
I'd imagine that inheriting doesn't count. Each person is meant to pay for it. If you pay for the original and a remastered edition is released, well the fact that the label released the album again would indicate there is a significant difference in their eyes, so you should pay for the new version.
Shipping Vinyl with a CD would be an arguable move because of CD production costs (however small they are), so the question would fall on Vinyl with mp3 tickets. The only good argument I can think of is that the buyer has to make a choice between quality and convenience (Vinyl and digital respectfully) and whether that argument is used comes down to the people selling the music. I guess it's a question of whether they want to force the buyer to pay for both. I'd view this as being a greedy move.
Brinkman wrote:What I wonder about is is listening to mp3s of albums I no longer own. Is that unethical?
If you lost/broke your copy then it seems decent to listen to the mp3s. If you sell the album on (which is an unethical act in itself, right?), you forfit the right to listen to those mp3s.