Steve V. wrote:
Like I said, I was asking. Makes a little more sense now, and helps me understand your argument a little more.
And a sampler CAN be an instrument if you pump original segments into it and manipulate them. But if you're using other people's sounds and music to sample, it's a stretch to call it an instrument.
It's not a stretch, no.
Steve V. wrote:But a turntable CAN'T CREATE SOUNDS. IT PLAYS SOUNDS ALREADY ON A RECORD...there's no CREATION. It's MANIPULATION. You can slow it down or speed it up, shit, maybe even add effects. But what is on that record is what is being played.
If I take an existing piece of art, and alter it, so it's completely different then the original, I've created something new. The same goes for a turntable. Those stutters, and pitch shifts weren't on the original recording, so the turntablist has created something new.
Steve V. wrote:You tell me how you can distinguish one guy's scratching from another, and I swear to god I'll send you money in the mail. There's nothing musical or creative about scratching a record. It makes the same sound every time I've heard it. Maybe time it is faster, some time it is slower, but it is the same principle with no variation. There's never been original scratching. It is the same shit in different bags. The first guy who ever did it MAY have been original, but it's just photocopied and stupid now.
Jesus, can you tell every guitar player apart? Most guitar playing sucks but I'm not dismissing all guitar playing.Can you tell me who exactly is banging every piece of sheet metal on Haber Mensch? I can't tell most players apart, but they still make interesting new sounds.
Skronk wrote:Scratching is using a turntable in an original way. See?
Steve V. wrote:No.
Then you've got bigger problems.
Steve V. wrote:Cellos are stringed instruments with a long history. Guitars are string instruments with a long history. You could much more easily and logically link using those two instruments together than you could a guitar to a turntable and vice versa.
The turntable has been around since the late 1800's. It has a long history. Longer than the electric guitar. But it doesn't mean that one makes the other look like shit.
Steve V. wrote:I have respect for the fact that there is a certain amount of ingeniuity in creating a unique brand of sound using turntables and giving black people in the projects a new way to rise to prominence and gain financial success, but it ain't a fucking instrument, and I don't think there's a single DJ on the planet who could hold a fucking candle to Robert Johnson.
Notice you're the only one comparing Robert Johnson to a DJ? And since DJ's don't make blues, or play the guitar. you can't compare them at all, even at the creative level, it's two different playing fields.
Steve V. wrote:I was talking about their creativity, not their instruments. Ubercat seemed to attempt a logical connection between Johnson basically creating a style of music that transcended many boundaries and influenced millions of artists to a DJ who influenced not many people outside of those within the genre. That's the connection. Creativity. Are you telling me Skribble is as good as Robert Johnson in terms of pure unadulterated creativity? Psha!
Not Skibble, Skribble sucks. DJ Shadow definitely made better mood music than Robert Johnson, but it's still wrong to compare them, on any level.
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.