Boombats wrote:Not only do I hope that Syrian guy gets off...

he did. like, for awhile before she caught on.

If not for civilization I swear like 90% of humanity would just fucking die based solely on their own stupidity.

isn't that the same scam that boombats fell for? but it was some kind of prostate shrinking cream or something?
Boombats, tell us the story again.

i wonder if it was steve martin's penis cream.

Oh, Steve Martins Penis Beauty Cream.

"It arrives in a brown box, with the words "NOT PENIS CREAM" stamped all over it in big bold letters."

That story is rediculous. He was doing this for 9 Months before she said "hey... wait a minute". If she is that gullible, she shouldn't be able to sue. Rape by deception, my ass.

I would go on over to wherever 'Rape of Deception' is playing.

WoundedFoot wrote:Rape by deception, my ass.

Hahahaha.

Hmm...I wonder how she finally figured it out after the NINE MONTHS?

Mandroid2.0 wrote:Hmm...I wonder how she finally figured it out after the NINE MONTHS?

Good point. Maybe she thought it was just water weight.

There was a case similar to this. Some guy called a woman and said he was a doctor and he had her blood test results and she had some rare disease and there were only two cures: one, some very painful procedure that would cost $10,000 and insurance would not cover, and two, have sex with a guy who had been given the antidote. This would only cost $1000, and again, not covered by insurance. When she said she didn't have enough money, he got angry and said she should try to come up with as much she could. You know, typical doctor behavior. She talked to her employer about it, and when the "doctor" found out, he again got really angry and told her not to talk to anyone else about it. Again, you know, typical doctor stuff, not enough to rouse her suspicions. Anyway, long story less long, she had sex with the guy, and then later on she realized what had happened, and they charged him with rape. It ended up not being rape, because "fraud in the inducement does not vitiate consent." In other words, as long as the woman agrees to have sex with the guy and knows she's having sex with the guy, it doesn't matter if she consented to it by a trick. Pretty infuriating stuff. I hope this one comes out the other way.