Unblinking Eye wrote:Here you go dipshit. Lets make sure we all know where you stand.

My mistake. I should have said......

Unblinking Eye wrote:Here you go cowardly dipshit. Lets make sure we all know where you stand.

not that anyone here thinks you have the balls to actually take a stand on this issue.


Please sign one of these statements.

I, Clocker Tom, believe that the professor of structural engineering at Purdue is not qualified enough to make the correct scientific conclusions as to what happened to the WTCs on 9/11

I, Clocker Tom, believe that the professor of structural engineering at Purdue, while qualified, cannot be trusted as he is part of the cabal of the official myth as to what happened on 9/11

Rick Reuben wrote:
How could fuel be crashing through a building at the same time it was burning outside the building? That's a very good question indeed. I'm sure Galanter will know.

It can't, it didn't, and the credibility of the standard theory doesn't require it.

The fuel crashed through the building and a fraction of a second later some of it came out the other side.

As for the possibility that 86000 pounds of fluid traveling 500 miles per hour can smash apart steel beams...this is something that can be calculated. Indeed this is merely one of the many things the Purdue simulation would have to calculate. That's what all that "finite element analysis" stuff is about.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_element_analysis

Offered a straight-up choice between Bob, I mean Rick's, from-the-hip intuitive sense of physics, and the careful calculations by the team at Purdue, I'll go with the latter.

911 is a Joke.

And by the way, when a liquid ignites and explodes its kinetic energy doesn't disappear. In fact the energy from the explosion is added to the kinetic energy already in play.

kerble wrote:911 is a Joke.

HAHA.

Clocker Flav:

put on your special edition 911 polarized glasses (available at the counter of every 711) and watch it again.

the flames shoot right out of the screen!

That's brilliant Nazi Bob. Between you, NIST and Purdue, you're the only one who hasn't included any science in their work.

Keep on typing Tom. It is the only way to keep the Jews at bay.

You're a real fucking nuisance, Unthinking Ass. Do you have anything worthwhile to add?

Skronk wrote:You're a real fucking nuisance, Unthinking Ass. Do you have anything worthwhile to add?

Sure Skronk.

How fucking stupid do you have to be to ignore any and all studies performed by the only people acedemically qualified to perform them (ACTUAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS), in spite of the fact that they routinely submit them to qualified jornals for peer review?

How fucking stupid do you have to be to instead believe the theories of far less qualified people (INTERNET CONSPIRACY THEORISTS) who refuse to submit any of their papers to qualified journals for peer review?

A scale of 1-10 is fine.