Moderator: Greg
Flaneur wrote:No, you and the intelligent design fundamentalists are using the same arguments, and the darwinists and the structural engineers are using the same arguments.
And you and Ann Coulter kind of debate things the same way, too.
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.
Skronk wrote:Paint me a pretty picture, how exactly do I and the ID'ers differ from the Darwinists and ST's in argument tactics?
Flaneur wrote:Skronk wrote:Paint me a pretty picture, how exactly do I and the ID'ers differ from the Darwinists and ST's in argument tactics?
Did you read Unblinking Eye's last post?
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.
Skronk wrote:Flaneur wrote:Skronk wrote:Paint me a pretty picture, how exactly do I and the ID'ers differ from the Darwinists and ST's in argument tactics?
Did you read Unblinking Eye's last post?
Well, I'm pretty sure I read it, because I fucking responded to it. What I asked you was to point out the differences between their presentations in argument.
Rick Reuben wrote:He went to bed about a decade ago, or whenever he sold his soul to the bankers and the elites.daniel robert chapman wrote:I think he's gone to bed, Rick.
Rick Reuben wrote:ue wrote:Does it not even occur to you why the conspiracy crowd refuses to submit their findings to credible scientific journals for peer review?
That's a common lie/ error, often made by dopes like you.
All the papers published here are available for peer review, and many have been peer reviewed:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
Flaneur wrote:I really mean, in fields like engineering and science, the peer review process, as I assume Unblinking Eye did in his last post.
Rick Reuben wrote:simmo wrote: It's pretty much impossible to keep a track of all the ideas you're putting out there when they're in this format.
I've said this ninety times. If you need someone to hold your hand and walk you through the theories, then you should return to your cave of manuactured consent right now. Take some goddamn initiative. If you care enough, you will research 9/11 like every other subject that has ever been researched- by getting books and by using the web-- and by 'using the web', I don't mean 'climb into the backseat of a car driven by clocker bob'.
I am an advocate for alternative history. I don't lie to you and tell you I give you both sides, unlike lying pompous shitheads like Galanter, who claims that he is objective, but is truthfully selling his side just as hard as I am selling mine.
See my posts as the equivalent of a fire alarm. I am telling you that something ( many things ) are WRONG with the story that your oligarchs fed you. If you don't see smoke, then go back to minding your own business. Don't ask me to go backwards 5000 steps and take your hand and walk you through where I have already been. I'm on the frontier. I don't want to return to La La Land and pick up dawdlers who, five years on, haven't begun to question 9/11 on their own.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest