It's not my job. I'm not qualified for that job.

The pictures are everywhere, CIA disinfo agent.

I thought this was an interesting little read. The information war rages on.

Here is some information I'd like to see.

About how many thermite charges were required to bring down WTC 1,2, and 7?

For each charge, what were the steps required to install them for later use?

How long did it take to install them, and how was this done without being noticed?

How were they triggered, keeping in mind the split second multiple delays that would be required to fit the "9/11 Truth" description of the event?

(I've yet to see an account of this project that is even remotely plausible. And it's not for not looking.)

Why do you hate Muslims?

galanter wrote:Here is some information I'd like to see.

Galanter, the thermite hypothesis is completely devoid of merit. Its proponent and popularizer is named Steven Jones. He is a wackjob Mormon "scientist" from Brigham Young University who also believes that Jesus Christ walked around North America at some point during the course of his life.

The 9/11 Truth movement is a phony hoax. E-mail me if you want me to even more conclusively show that such is the case.

I've watched a lot of videos that suggest an alternate version of what happened on 9/11 - and read a lot of what you have posted here - and it's all very compelling.

But at the same time, the part that I can't really get by - from a practical point of view - is how did all this happen without anybody blowing the whistle? Clearly - the logistics involved in planning something like this - involving both government and civilian agencies - was enormous and would have required the cooperation of a lot of people - both government and otherwise. How did they guarantee that noone would talk?

I can't get past that - there's a lot of compelling evidence, but there's also human nature.

It certainly seems like something is amiss, and that something deserves a serious and extensive investigation. I remember thinking that detailed reporting of the event seemed strangely curtailed. It didn't instantly occur to me that 'perhaps this is a huge false flag attack', but mass media coverage just spat out some statistics and immediately concentrated on highly emotional and speculative footage. At least to the point where it was something I noticed.

Now, I think its completely unreasonable to think that our government isn't capable of pulling something like this. Does anyone ever read decent history journals? I haven't much as of late, but in college I found several interesting papers on events...Shay's Rebellion, actual military journals from the Civil War on, the Invasion of Panama, that huge host of other Central American tragedies, the weird support for the KLA in Yugoslavia (not to mention the poorly done 'concentration camp' propaganda footage all over the networks), etc. Not to mention the leaked and declassified CIA records. Good fucking god. Iran-Contra.

The way I look at it, 9-11 was going to happen one way or the other. It was attempted before (remember that partially successful bombing back in '94?). People are understandably pissed. Add culture clash and valuable resources and something is going to get blown up, somewhere. We are talking about humans here, after all.

Nerbly Bear...have you read my posts on this...posted long before you saw the light?

My point was that the standard theory has a complete account of the attack and collapse. Folks may not agree with it, but at least there is a full account.

The alternative "9/11 truth" theory (or theories) only tries to poke holes in the standard theory, but it does not present a complete account in the form of an alternate theory.

Until the "9/11 truth" alternate theory includes a complete account that is even vaguely plausible, it can't be held as a compelling theory. It's mostly incomplete, and as such it isn't a collection of truths at all, it's just a cluster of questions. (And virtually all of those questions have been answered if one cares to look and can stand to be objective.)

So until the "9/11 truth" folks can answer the following questions, *there is no alternate theory*.

About how many thermite charges were required to bring down WTC 1,2, and 7?

For each charge, what were the steps required to install them for later use?

How long did it take to install them, and how was this done without being noticed?

How were they triggered, keeping in mind the split second multiple delays that would be required to fit the "9/11 Truth" description of the event?

I'm not looking for slam-dunk proof here. Just a plausible alternate theory that gets close to the level of detail the standard theory offers.