NerblyBear wrote:How about someone trying to explain why we have to give quantitative values to artists' work?
'Cause my mind is a knife and I aim to use it.
Moderator: Greg
NerblyBear wrote:How about someone trying to explain why we have to give quantitative values to artists' work?
dontfeartheringo wrote:I need people to act like grown folks and I just ain't seeing it.
Brett Eugene Ralph wrote:NerblyBear wrote:How about someone trying to explain why we have to give quantitative values to artists' work?
'Cause my mind is a knife and I aim to use it.
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.
I disagree. Solid Gold is excellent, yes, an album for the ages, and even more musically adventurous in places ("He'd Send The Army") but Entertainment! has a fucking white-hot diamond-hard tempered edge to it, in performance, sound, and songwriting.SecondEdition wrote:Antero wrote:In everyone's opinion, more like. Even the songs that are good from Songs of the Free are less-than-awesomely recorded.Steve V. wrote:Gang of Four is an excellent band, but in my opinion only on two records.
But seriously.
Entertainment?
What a fucking monster of a record.
Solid Gold is better. Even without the Another Day, Another Dollar EP appended.
Linus Van Pelt wrote:I subscribe to neither prong of your false dichotomy.
FuzzBob wrote:Let's think about Joy Division objectively, tuning out the JD overkill from the past few years that makes it easy to think they're crap by default: they put out two great records followed by one meandering record as New Order, followed by a string of pop hits. They are also, however, responsible for spawning The Cure, Hot Topic stores, and mall gothdom.
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests