bigc wrote:I opened it, and read it...it said they were SUCKERS.
This made me chuckle audibly.
Moderator: Greg
bigc wrote:I opened it, and read it...it said they were SUCKERS.
bigc wrote:I opened it, and read it...it said they were SUCKERS.
Rick Reuben wrote:Unrelated- there has been a rash of official-looking phishing emails purporting to be from irs.gov going around, promising tax refunds. It's all Russian bullshit.
Rick Reuben wrote:Unrelated- there has been a rash of official-looking phishing emails purporting to be from irs.gov going around, promising tax refunds. It's all Russian bullshit.
tocharian wrote:Cheese fries vs nonexistence. Duh.
Skronk wrote:There's nothing really the RIAA could do besides taking the site down completely.
newberry wrote:Skronk wrote:There's nothing really the RIAA could do besides taking the site down completely.
And/or sue.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/riaa ... l-awarded/
http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/31/know ... s-calling/
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.
Skronk wrote:newberry wrote:Skronk wrote:There's nothing really the RIAA could do besides taking the site down completely.
And/or sue.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/riaa ... l-awarded/
http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/31/know ... s-calling/
Oink had upwards of 180,000 people if I remember correctly. What just opened, and they've got at least 15,000. The RIAA doesn't have that vast amount of time or resources to track down more than a handful of people, and it probably wouldn't make it to trial. Soulseek's a bit different.
They rely on scare tactics, and underhanded shit like paying Media Defender or hackers to fuck with sites. Or they get helped by proxy by some stooge in England with too much time on his hands.
There's nothing really the RIAA could do besides taking the site down completely.
newberry wrote:Skronk wrote:newberry wrote:Skronk wrote:There's nothing really the RIAA could do besides taking the site down completely.
And/or sue.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/riaa ... l-awarded/
http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/31/know ... s-calling/
Oink had upwards of 180,000 people if I remember correctly. What just opened, and they've got at least 15,000. The RIAA doesn't have that vast amount of time or resources to track down more than a handful of people, and it probably wouldn't make it to trial. Soulseek's a bit different.
They rely on scare tactics, and underhanded shit like paying Media Defender or hackers to fuck with sites. Or they get helped by proxy by some stooge in England with too much time on his hands.
There's nothing really the RIAA could do besides taking the site down completely.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests