Sorry folks - but given Mr Bored's tactics a couple of weeks ago I can't resist this one.

happyandbored wrote:This is my last post...

cue several more posts.

badumchsk

What this thread really needs is a couple of guys in Roman garb to sit around looking unamused as we tear each other to shreds.

Hey Bob, having a decent day? More grapes?

big_dave wrote:What this thread really needs is a couple of guys in Roman garb to sit around looking unamused as we tear each other to

Ha ha, I think it would look like this...



























This thread is tapped.[/k.g.]

Kill him, centurians.

If that's how you see things, (p)Rick, what can I do?
You're even at the point where you're using people's insults and MOs against them as if they were your own. That's pretty hillarious.

As I've said, everyone here seems to be an insane, stupid, liar, but you and your protegé, right?
I'll let the statistical liklihood of that speak for itself.

-A

Do you entertain the possibility that what you are saying might not be the truth, and that you might be mistaken?

You argue on the internet because it silences your own doubts about your opinions? Seems like you should try to be less emotionally invested.

I'm also noticing that you bring up other peoples' "research", or lack therefore, but a while ago before you "left", you lambasted the forum for attacking your sources and not the information you got from them. Seems to me the validity and reliability of information is what needs to be checked before "research" (I hope we're both using the same science analogy here) can continue in earnest. A lot of people here are very familiar with conspiracy theories and well versed with them, they are part of our popular culture.

Side topic, considering how calm you are being now, I notice that you are a big fan of the founding fathers. This strikes me as very odd, considering that you are also a big fan of the masonic/illuminati idea that NWO existed prior to the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Most masonic conspiracy I know of involve the founders to some extent, as they are the ones who picked the allegedly "masonic" symbols used in American civic life.

How does that work? If you're putting the NWO firmly in the hands of select American lodges that doesn't come close to explaining how they could exert global influence in a mail/telegram era. Especially considering that the American independence movement took place with opposition to lodges in Britain, during the only period of British history where lodges had politcal power outside of sectarian thuggery in Ireland and Scotland, considering that Catholicism was no longer a threat, protestant secret groups and houses were almost obscelete and turning into the elitist but harmless men's clubs we know today, like the UK masons and the Lions.

Also, you're relying on interpretations from two obvious hoaxes (Protocols and Masonic Investigation) both of which indeed have their American origins during the anti-communist years.

I think you took my original post to mean that any hypothetical conspiracy would have to have its origin between 1910 and 1960, rather the theories themselves as I posted.