NOT CRAP

This movie really got to me when it came out--I saw it three times in the theater. Years later I rented it and it wasn't the same. There's this one scene where Billy is on the front steps of his parent's house and he's like "don't touch me / hold me" and it seemed artificial. I couldn't watch past that point. Maybe in the theater it just tricked me cause it looks beautiful.

Edit: still, Not Crap.

great film. funny. great use of prog rock.

brown bunny was boring, even watching a skank suck a sleezeball.

i loved it... granted i haven't seen it in probably 7 years, but i think i'd still like it... yes was a bonus.
but what's with the vincent gallo vodka commercials?

Rotten Tanx wrote:Christina Ricci's character (layla/wendy) could have done with some backstory. There's no reason given for her liking him. She doesn't mention her own life at all.

Actually, it's the lack of exposition that I appreciate. There isn't a reason and you don't know, except for a really quick case of Stockholm Syndrome.

The movie's main strength, I think, is its atmosphere. It can be incredibly chilly and distant and still feel intimate.

I remember reading that Gallo had stated he'd never finished reading a novel and that he was generally not a literary or well read person. That maybe works for Buffalo 66 in a way that it didn't work for Brown Bunny. The scenes between actors in Buffalo 66 seemed, for the most part, pretty direct and not really affected by much. Brown Bunny, for the most part, lacked other actors that Gallo could react to.

I really love how Gallo cast this film's supporting roles...
Gazzara, A. Houston, Mickey Rourke, Jan-Michael Vincent, Rosanna Arquette.
There is something very consistent about those choices, and while I don't really care to nail down the reasons why in a few sentences, I feel like I would have gone for the same actors had I been casting or directing.

Dr. O' Nothing wrote:I really love how Gallo cast this film's supporting roles...
Gazzara, A. Houston, Mickey Rourke, Jan-Michael Vincent, Rosanna Arquette.
There is something very consistent about those choices, and while I don't really care to nail down the reasons why in a few sentences[...]

I'll do it, gladly.

Ben Gazzara: John Cassavetes fantasy.

Angelica Houston: John Houston fantasy/hopeful of a blowjob

Mickey Rourke: Tough guy! Difficult to work with! Loved by the French

Jan-Michael Vincent: Tacky 80's tv star + motorcycle crash = cut-price Tarantino.

Rosanna Arquette: Probably after a blowjob.

Niko wrote:A better film would be hard to find.

I actually think it would be one of the easiest tasks a person could undertake.

This is a great film.

This film is great.

[I]t's beautifully shot, wonderfully edited, superbly acted and delciately constructed.

wonderful.

great cast, great script, well exectuted.

In my view one of the best films ever made.

I feel so alone sometimes.

Double cunting post.

run joe run wrote:

Dr. O' Nothing wrote:I really love how Gallo cast this film's supporting roles...
Gazzara, A. Houston, Mickey Rourke, Jan-Michael Vincent, Rosanna Arquette.
There is something very consistent about those choices, and while I don't really care to nail down the reasons why in a few sentences[...]

I'll do it, gladly.

Ben Gazzara: John Cassavetes fantasy.

Angelica Houston: John Houston fantasy/hopeful of a blowjob

Mickey Rourke: Tough guy! Difficult to work with! Loved by the French

Jan-Michael Vincent: Tacky 80's tv star + motorcycle crash = cut-price Tarantino.

Rosanna Arquette: Probably after a blowjob.

Is that supposed to be my thinking, Gallo's thinking, or are you just projecting, big time?

Anyway, you didn't address the issue of consistency among these actors. If you can nail it down, please do.

Dr. O' Nothing wrote:Is that supposed to be my thinking, Gallo's thinking, or are you just projecting, big time?

Gallo's.

Anyway, you didn't address the issue of consistency among these actors. If you can nail it down, please do.

Gallo's fantasies, in a bollockshell.