who hates Me ?

103
that damned fly wrote:
run joe run wrote:
that damned fly wrote:we all get to feeling the place has turned to shit from time to time.


Yes, I get that feeling when you make 563 meaningless posts per day.


go fuck yourself, chief.

edit: is this one meaningful enough?


Yes, it is, in that you are at least making a point.

who hates Me ?

104
Minotaur029 wrote:
sleepkid wrote:I would say that the general quality of the forums has taken a turn for the worse mostly due to the influx of several obsessive compulsive posters.


[Ears, a burning sensation]

sleepkid wrote:These are people who have apparently chosen EA as their forum of joy, and lurk on it all day long, posting obsessively and vociferously even if they have nothing to say.


What??...no...[adjusts collar]...

sleepkid wrote:You know exactly who these people are. They've got recent join dates (say late 2006 to early 2007), but they're already well into the thousands (and thousands) of posts.


Is November 1st really considered late 2006?

sleepkid wrote:Now, if you'll pardon me, I have to go rent some ice skates to some creature from the ninth plane of Hell.


[Flipping through Dante's Inferno]...okay...right...no Minotaur...


ABSOLUTION


[pulls head out of ass=] Hate to stickle, but the minotaur actually is included in Inferno. It guards the entrance to the seventh circle of hell.[/sticks head back into ass]
Madness waits for some. It creeps up on others.

who hates Me ?

107
run joe run wrote:
that damned fly wrote:
run joe run wrote:
that damned fly wrote:we all get to feeling the place has turned to shit from time to time.


Yes, I get that feeling when you make 563 meaningless posts per day.


go fuck yourself, chief.

edit: is this one meaningful enough?


Yes, it is, in that you are at least making a point.


i always make a point. whether it's one your care about is your problem.
buy my guitar. now with pictures!

who hates Me ?

108
beloveless wrote:
My reason for starting this thread was that just like some folks have trouble reading me I have trouble reading them as well ( communication can be difficult when conversational language is used without the beneficial cues of inflection or body language and "smiley's" don't really do the trick).


So, let me get it straight. When you call someone a "faggot" or say that the basketball team were "indeed nappy-headed" and some of them are most likely "Ho's", It's the lack of proper smileys that makes you so misunderstood. If you just had the right smiley selection, you would be so much less of a douche, right?


Blow me, you fake.
music

offal wrote:Holy shit.

Kerble was wrong.

This certainly changes things.

who hates Me ?

109
Dr. Venkman wrote:
beloveless wrote:
My reason for starting this thread was that just like some folks have trouble reading me I have trouble reading them as well ( communication can be difficult when conversational language is used without the beneficial cues of inflection or body language and "smiley's" don't really do the trick).


So, let me get it straight. When you call someone a "faggot" or say that the basketball team were "indeed nappy-headed" and some of them are most likely "Ho's", It's the lack of proper smileys that makes you so misunderstood. If you just had the right smiley selection, you would be so much less of a douche, right?


Blow me, you fake.


ha! yea i remember that one about the basketball team. i'm sure you can find similar sorts of comments all over youtube under any video related to the imus incident. "but that basketball team really was a bunch of nappy headed hos!".... those types tend to frequent youtube, or at least they comment really frequently. around here you don't see that sort of stuff so often.
http://www.soundclick.com/hanabimusic (band)
http://www.myspace.com/iambls (i make beats for that dude)

who hates Me ?

110
that damned fly wrote:i always make a point. whether it's one your care about is your problem.


No, you really don't.

What made, and still makes, this place rock is the integrity and restraint of its best posters. They tend to post like this:

1. Enter a discussion with a thoughtful and reasoned slant on the topic at hand and express their feelings on the subject as lucidly as they are able.

2. Not post any more on said topic, unless the discussion moves forward and they have something further to add of worth to the advancing/changing subject.

It is this which makes this forum a rarity on the internet.

You just strike me as someone who is bored and likes the sound of his own voice, not to mention the look of his own face, considering your pathological drive to post pictures of yourself.

The only reason I'm mentioning this at all is that you chimed in with high fallutin' wisdom about the state of the forum, which, coming from you, is a bit rich.

There's a simple question a person can ask themselves when they post: Is this worth reading?

I don't feel any particular personal dislike toward you. You just post a hell of a lot without saying very much, and therefore lower, rather than maintain, the high standard the forum set itself.

But, y'know...whatever.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests