numberthirty wrote:So, did you give NerblyBear any sort of a heads up in regards to said offer?
Heads up? No. I don't really think it's necessary. One look at Zack's picture and it's a done deal.
Moderator: Greg
numberthirty wrote:So, did you give NerblyBear any sort of a heads up in regards to said offer?
ubercat wrote:numberthirty wrote:So, did you give NerblyBear any sort of a heads up in regards to said offer?
Heads up? No. I don't really think it's necessary. One look at Zack's picture and it's a done deal.
ubercat wrote:I think people are going to eat this movie up. The level of detail is insane. Anyone connected with the film has commented on the level of detail.
An interesting thing about Watchmen is the absence of thought balloons in the entire comic. This is the primary reason why here is so much speculation on the meta-plot of Watchmen. So when it comes to making a movie, the lack of thought balloons is going to help - Watchmen is essentially a storyboard anyway. I mean, that's the idea behind much of the graphic novel - the cinematic feel of a movie in a comic.
This is a frame for frame adaptation, with live action. The only cgi is Dr Manhattan's glow and Rorschach's mask. Oh, and the space scenes are cgi also...
ubercat wrote:I said 'essentially'. I am aware that Watchmen was designed to break the 'limitations' of the form.
I guess I should have said, "Watchmen can be used as a storyboard. It's currently being used as a storyboard - Z. Snyder carries it like a bible while directing. Z.S. is also using each frame to set up each shot."
Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Oof. This sentence is terrible.
As in Dale Jr.'s English Language Handbook terrible.
God, we're all fucked.
You had me at Sex Traction Aunts Getting Vodka-Rogered On Glass Furniture
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests