Prankster Ships Unabomberish Manifesto In Place Of iPod

11
Rick Reuben wrote:Cassette walkmans are much less destructive to human attention spans than .mp3 boxes, because the cassette plays you the songs just like vinyl does, in the order that the artist intended, at the proper pace. iPods give you the option to jump all over the place, 10 secs of one song, a minute of another, the iPod wheel much like the comfortable TV remote. the iPod wheel encourages you to make snap judgements on music just like the TV remote lets you scan from channel to channel like a zombie. It trains you to have a shorter attention span.


This assumes everyone using a Walkman recorded cassettes that included albums in their entirety and didn't make mixtapes, which I know I did a lot, as did many of my friends. It also assumes people never used the rewind or fast-forward keys, which (again) I know I did quite frequently -- these functions are a lot easier to work with on a iPod, but they certainly had their precedent in the earlier technology.

It bothers me greatly that we are living in an increasingly post-literate society, but I think a widespread disrespect towards the written word has far more to do with this problem than digital audio technology. The fact that literally millions of kids line up to read Harry Potter novels suggests to me that there is still an audience for a good solid book in our hyperactive society, but it has to be made into a pop culture phenomenon in order for anyone to be interested. That's a far bigger problem than kids wanting to skip tunes on the crappy My Chemical Romance albums they've downloaded (and personally I'd say skipping through that stuff is a rare sign of taste and intelligence on their part).
"Everything should be kept. I regret everything I’ve ever thrown away." -- Richard Hell

Prankster Ships Unabomberish Manifesto In Place Of iPod

13
miseryandthesun wrote:I'm entertained by the fact that this guy is effectively entertaining the notion that reading any book is a surefire way to free yourself from the sinister shackles of entertainment media.


Dude! You never read Surefire Ways to Free Yourself From the Sinister Shackles of Entertainment Media By Pfr. A.I. Livingston? Put down the Pod, brother. Free your mind.

If you want I'll send you the audiobook over Sendspace?
ROCK IS KITSCH!
Image

Prankster Ships Unabomberish Manifesto In Place Of iPod

16
Rick Reuben wrote:
Mark Lansing wrote:So why is it that we're supposedly blaming the iPod for folks not reading?
They're part of a lineage that begins with the television, I think.

Cassette walkmans are much less destructive to human attention spans than .mp3 boxes, because the cassette plays you the songs just like vinyl does, in the order that the artist intended, at the proper pace. iPods give you the option to jump all over the place, 10 secs of one song, a minute of another, the iPod wheel much like the comfortable TV remote. the iPod wheel encourages you to make snap judgements on music just like the TV remote lets you scan from channel to channel like a zombie. It trains you to have a shorter attention span.

For every person I observe who seems to be listening to the music on their iPod at a normal pace ( one song ends, another song begins ), I see another person clicking the wheel of theirs like a cracked-out monkey. When such people are confronted with an orderly presentation of information that must be consumed one page at a time, like a book, their brains make them all fidgety, because they're conditioned to click from one web page to the next, click from one song to the next, click from one channel to the next. They're scraping the tops off information, not consuming it whole.

That's why you can give a person a TV remote and come back three hours later and ask them what they watched, and they won't be able to tell you 75% of what they viewed. Nobody forgets the vinyl record they listened to three minutes after the needle hits the last groove.


Whooo!! Haven't heard that critique since the mid-seventies.

And that said from someone on an internet forum.

Now if only noone shows them kids how to displace the needle on that record. Otherwise they might start cutting and scratching ...

In the 19th century people did belive that books would turn the kids into monsters. Did that happen?

(But then again 1st world war started soo after that) ...

Prankster Ships Unabomberish Manifesto In Place Of iPod

18
I think a lot of people feel overwhelmed by literature, and consequently indifferent toward it.

But some folks just aren't endowed with the sort of faculties that would allow them to appreciate books in the first place. I think this has a lot less to do with a supposed lack of intelligence than it does a basic lack of an "appetite" for such simple but refined pleasures- because nonreaders don't have a need for books in their lives, they aren't able to cultivate an adequate degree of sensitivity toward them.

The fact is, most people don't regard reading as a rewarding and stimulating pursuit but rather a chore. Or, to be more charitable, they may appreciate the value of books from afar but don't really have the initiative and/or the time to devote themselves to them. In a way, for these people, literature is like the rowing machine in the basement or the pilates ball in the bedroom closet that they intend to use some day but in the back of their minds know they never will.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest