![Image](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e92/mbeebe900/riding.jpg)
![Image](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e92/mbeebe900/wall_ride2.jpg)
Moderator: Greg
Bob Weston wrote:
love my bike
wiggins wrote:Bob is gargantuan. Larger than life.
it's nice. no pimp shit, they don't have deep V's in cream, and I ain't got the paper anyways. the cranks are nice I've heard. Complete for $250, plus $10 in paint, I think it's a solid ride.
Bob Weston wrote:It is, in fact, the perfect size for me, my man. I come from a time when you picked your frame size by standing over the bike, lifting the front wheel off the ground, and the correct frame size was found when you could lift the wheel up about an inch before hitting your nuts.
I am so not into you guys with your modern puny frames. I rode the "correct" sized frame (read "puny") for a while. But I got to miss a nice big frame and the way it feels and flexes. The geometry, feel and ride of a big frame is awesome.
This is 80's FRAME. Big and chrome-moly. Eat me.
bob
benadrian wrote:Oh, I shop at Rivendell Bicycle, I know about these concepts
I also ride a steel frame. I can't stand aluminum. I've never ridden carbon or titanium for more than a spin around a parking lot. I beat the crap out of my bike.
Maybe it's the photos, but it just looked like a 64cm frame or something made for a 6'6" dude.
Ben
benadrian wrote:wiggins wrote:Bob is gargantuan. Larger than life.
it's nice. no pimp shit, they don't have deep V's in cream, and I ain't got the paper anyways. the cranks are nice I've heard. Complete for $250, plus $10 in paint, I think it's a solid ride.
I mean physically, not sonically.
Deep Vs can suck my nuts.
Ben
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests