Ace wrote:Ishmael wrote:
I'm saying that Herzog's subjects are just as important to his films as he is. Herzog's documentary 'Little Deiter Needs To Fly' might be his best film, and no one is "acting" in that movie. Herzog's directoral choices are complementary to his subject matter, and his films would be lacking if they weren't.
Could you imagine 'Aguirre' without Klaus Kinski? Probably not.
In contrast, a filmmaker like Fassbinder, or Wenders, could probably use any performer or subject and make a great film (perhaps not AS good as the ones they did choose, but I honestly don't think it would have made that much of a difference).
I'm not entirely sure about this. Herzog has said himself that his documentaries should really be in inverted commas. The Minnesota Decleration, Ecstatic Truth and all that. While you could say that 'no-one is acting', the audience's perception of reality is manipulated and blurred. It's there in a lot of his films, made up quotations and such like. He invents his subjects, and refigures them in a profound way.
I don't know much about Wenders, and nothing about Fassbinder, but to accuse Herzog of relying on things outside of his skill as a director doesn't really hold much weight. Of course Kinski is instrumental to Aguirre and Fitzcarraldo, but to a certain extent it was Herzog's direction and control that shaped those performances.
Anyway. About as Not Crap as you can get. I haven't seen all of his films, but each and every one from the boxsets is fascinating and moving in its own way. Added to this is the appeal of the Herzog-myth. I know he's not crazy, and he didn't direct Kinski by waving a gun at him, but he did walk the border of Berlin and drag a fucking ship over a mountain. He's a remarkable man.
I'm going to watch Heart of Glass again later.