Colonel Panic wrote:Are you saying that his rhetoric of oversimplification and failure to communicate effectively has somehow "rubbed off" on the American people as a whole? I don't believe that, Bush's approval ratings have clearly shown that the American public are not happy with his performance and no longer trust or believe in his message.
Am I saying that? To be honest, once I start using Bush words I quickly lose the ability to understand what the hell I'm saying. In that universe of semantic degradation ideas like irony and meaning become just as empty as the language they are supposed to be describing.
The Reagan comparison is interesting. The great communicator might not have been interested in truth, but he used the same language we all do, and if you fell victim to his babble, I'd say the fault is still your own. Everybody simplifies, just like everybody believes the simplifications that suit their ends. I mean, it sure is nice to imagine that cutting tax rates is going to send tax revenues soaring through the ceiling. But "con" is the operative word here, and cons always work by appealing to the marks' wish to cut a corner.
The awful thing about the Bush era is that a notion like "study their rhetoric" is just about as useless as a voting machine in Florida. We are in an era of nihilism. Our leaders lie to us and don't even try to disguise the fact. They don't speak to us in complete sentences. Grammar is below them. The only response a question elicits is an insult. Language is a jumble of menacing sounds and we are lucky they even give us that. Unfortunately, this has infected the wider culture. Bush's approval ratings don't have anything to do with it.