STF wrote:I've always thought that when your average person talks about a "good" guitar player they mean someone who plays a lot of notes really fast. Maybe a lot of notes really fast and far apart from each other. This is CRAP.
I disagree. To me, it's completely value-neutral.
Particularly "notey" guitar playing has such a negative stigma because it's hard not to associate it with bad hair bands from 20 years ago and the douchebags who love them.
Think about Fripp, or for that matter, a Bach interpretation on classical guitar in which, despite the notiness, every note reflects a beautiful economy of means and is absolutely essential to the piece. In these two instances, the music is just as if not more "notey" than a wheedly rock guitar solo, except the music is also good.
"Notiness" just is. It is neither good nor bad; it simply assumes the quality level of the music it applies to.
iembalm wrote:Can I just point out, Rick, that this rant is in a thread about a cartoon?