Movie: Juno (2007)

Crapola
Total votes: 43 (57%)
Not Crapola
Total votes: 32 (43%)
Total votes: 75

Movie: Juno

111
Rotten Tanx wrote: At first all the lame/cool retro crap was annoying. The racer bikes, the hamburger phone, the Atari (or whatever) t-shirts, "Thundercats are go!" and so forth.


WTF? "Thundercats are go?"

Look love, it's either "ThunderBIRDS are go" or "Thundercats HOOOOOOO".
You can't have it both ways.

I just saw this film. Not Crap, but not great either. I enjoyed 'Superbad' more.
arthur wrote:Don't cut it for work don't cut it to look normal, people who feel offended by your nearly-30-with-long-hair face should just fuck off.

Movie: Juno

113
Not crap. Dr. Awkward and Linus already said what points I would have made, so I will not repeat.

However, maybe it's because I'm not a disillusioned 30-something who lived through the 1990s and the rise of hipsters, but I like the soundtrack. Call me crazy.
Dr. McNinja wrote:I just surfed a robo dracula from the Moon, so all y'alls can just take it.

Movie: Juno

115
I enjoyed this film this evening. I thought it was sweet, and reminded me of a lot of the things that I like about American indie cinema of the '90's.

I don't think that it is a great film. Leaving the cinema, I realised that it hadn't changed my perspective on anything significant. Which in turn made me realise that the ability to introduce striking new thoughts to an audience might be a requisite for great art. However, I liked the characters, I liked the way it was filmed, I thought it was witty, and the ending was fresh to me. (Though a friend I saw it with countered that he thought it well signposted.)

I understand how all the talk of the Melvins, Sonic Youth, the Stooges et al might seen mannered, but it is a mannered film, and I think that is part of its charm.

Not crap.
Gib Opi kein Opium, denn Opium bringt Opi um!

Movie: Juno

116
richterbjack wrote:Actually, the movie did galvanize quite a few people of that persuasion; there are more than enough articles and op-eds in national newspapers to attest to that.


You're kind of right - I guess I should have said the film shouldn't have been galvanizing. Both sides had their main points (the need of a woman to be able to choose/life should be cherished) presented and, ultimately, celebrated in a way where everyone won.



richterbjack wrote:Maybe we're on different wavelengths here, but I don't see the role of the single working mother as particularly controversial, either. Considering that half of all marriages end in divorce now, many having produced children, it's the demographic reality. I think most people who still harbor some kind of animosity towards single mothers are considered the fringe by everyone else, and rightly so.


We are on different wavelengths. I'm not saying being a single working mother is controversial, I'm saying giving a baby to a single parent through adoption is less common than giving it to a couple of parents. It definitely still happens, but there's a lingering stigma that single moms can't do it as well as a mom and a dad.

My point was that the movie outlined the fallacy in that kind of automatic thinking. The ending struck me as extremely feminist in a very positive way as it presented a young woman who saw one other lone woman as all the baby would need to grow up happy and healthy.


A great book about a different-from-the-norm adoption is Dan Savage's The Kid. Very educational, very funny, very resonant.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests