floog wrote:Cranius wrote:Thanks that was really thought provoking...
Well, in some ways, but in other ways I just roll my eyes and sigh "oh for fuck's sake".
That Michael Pollan article is nothing radical. I find it astonishing that we have been utterly overtaken by all the nonsense that surrounds us that our grandparent's principles have been obliterated within a couple of generations. If any of our grandparents were to read any of the above posts, they would piss themselves laughing (and not because of their incontinence).
Look, I don't mean to be negative or offensive, but when people earn their living from simply raiding their grandparents' memories reminding us of things that we really should already know, and then begin to label it "ecosophy" or ""avant-gardening", staking claim to a radical movement, then I lose all heart. Rubbish saying alert: Necessity is the mother of invention goes the old saying, and when our grandparents had needs they also had the wherewithal and knowledge to get on and do something about it. I guess that necessity has been sucked out of us.
I take your points, maybe I'm overtheorising it.
Pollan's allusion to 'victory gardens' is apt though. If you imagine wartime to be a situation in extremis, then a parallel to ecological disaster is a fair one IMO. Similarly, people through the depression and war were forced to recycle and make-do and mend. Then it was seen as a patriotic duty. These are practices that we unlearned in 50's. Growing your own vegetables was a radical response to radical times. Certainly that's what Pollan is saying regarding Vaclav Havel under a totalitarian regime; how they 'resolved that they would simply conduct their lives “as if” they lived in a free society.' Their refusal is radical for me, just as the effects of our consumption patterns are radical. I like the idea of gardening subtracting from the damage we are doing.