dontfeartheringo wrote:cesb wrote:
You are one of the people here who I think almost always gets it right. But I gotta disagree with your Ralph Molina assessment, even though you've obviously put more thought into it than I have. I'm pretty much going on "Ragged Glory" on which I feel he eats it. DISTRACTINGLY rickety, not in a good way, though I admit it's endearing to some degree. I get that it's not supposed to be perfect and solid.
Well, is called RAGGED Glory. As in, "Well, that's Crazy Horse, in all its... (cough, cough) uh, ragged glory..."
I have spent a lot more time with Rust Never Sleeps and Live Rust, and I think both of those are amazing records.
Dudes get older. Their chemical intake goes up and down... I'll have to go back and listen to Ragged Glory again and report back.
The Crazy Horse trio is the sum of its parts. Period.
You cannot break any one of those guys apart from it and expect him to be anything special.
It's like taking 2/3 of the letters in a word away and expecting it to mean something. It works sometimes, but not with them.
I am reminded of a long-ago Robt Christgau comment about Billy Talbot, that he could "no more get on the one than lead a gamelan ensemble."
Why does it work when you put them all together? A mystery, and part of why rock music is great.