Foldyourarmsandsaynah wrote:connor wrote:Minotaur029 wrote:So, Mark Warner is supposedly on the "short list" of Obama's VP preferences.
How did I not think of that guy before? (<-don't answer that).
It's a good idea except that Warner is currently running for senate. And winning.
Could he be Obama's running-mate while still running for Senate? And if Obama wins the general and Warner wins the senate race, does someone appoint someone to take his senate seat? Or is there another election?
If that
highly unlikely event were to happen, and Warner still won despite having already been crowned VP, the governor would appoint an interim senator for a full term.
While tearing Warner away from a Senate seat he would surely win would be irritating, I don't think this scenario is necessarily so unlikely.
First of all, Warner wanted to run for President. He wisely chose to sit this election out around the time that speculation about who would run was at its highest. He was a high-profile contender, too.
Second of all, the guy is only 53. If Obama were to win eight years in office, Warner would be in an ideal position to replace him. He's very popular in Virginia (13 electoral votes).
He looks like way less of a loose cannon than Jim Webb, too.
Biggest bonus: in addition to being popular across the battleground of Virginia, Mark Warner is originally from Indianapolis, IN...Obama continues to poll evenly with McCain in what Marsupialized dubbed "Illinois's retarded little sister". Warner makes the possibility of an electoral win in Virginia very real in addition to being attractive to people from Indiana.
Is an Obama victory in Indiana realistic? I don't know, but I don't think that it's out of the question by a longshot.
kerble wrote:Ernest Goes to Jail In Your Ass