nathan. wrote:they were really arch and ironic, but I think they're sort of numbed out and burnt on modern life and it's dehumanizing aspects. I kind of thought that was the whole point.
Change that 'but' to an 'and,' and I agree 100%.
Sure, that was the point.
There's a few bands with a 'numbed out and burnt on modern life and its dehumanizing aspects' thing going on that I love.
But none of them are arch or ironic.
I've never thought about it this much, but I guess I'm not that taken by the combination of those elements--archness, irony, and 'numbed out and burnt on modern life.'
It's kind of a drag as an aesthetic, and I'm not feeling it, number one. It's not engaging, it's not that funny, I do not connect with it personally.
Number two, even if I was feeling it, I'm not going to hang my hat on it. You pinch numbness and dehumanization in with irony, and things get claustrophobic pretty quick.
If the music was good enough, I would never even think about any of that shit. I would roll with it. On occasion Devo is that good. But not a lot.
I love the B-52's.
Anyway DEVO wins, even though I do love the B-52's. This poll is like comparing the Dead Kennedys to Nena.
I think Devo->DKs is an insightful comparison.
I have less use for the DKs than Devo, for many of the same reasons I'm not that into Devo, as outlined above.
B-52's->Nena is ridiculous, but I think you know that.