dear mr 110th,
i don't intend to be rude but your certainty of many ideas are incorrect. duke, i am all for money! steve not so much, c'est la vie... i'd rather wake up and look forward to the day ahead than be mr gallo and work on owning things and figuring out a new way to get the gallo name on the internet to crush the misery that lives in his head.
i couldn't be in your cult- i could not stand taking that much time out of my day on that hairdo, or taking care of so many children, or being raped at 12 by my cousin, dad, uncle...
personally i am not into bootlicking- it seems boring and that takes natural inoculation to an absurd level. just allow yourself to eat a piece of food that has fallen on your kitchen floor, right?
personally, i wouldn't necessarily purchase a house in the hollywood hills with millions of dollars, but i have friends that have. that is what they like-- i like my space foam mattress! it cost a lot of money and i don't feel bad about it.
now... i admit that i place hard work (and i do not mean once being a dishwasher) above convincing someone you dated while they were under-age to suck your dick on camera as
art, when your true intentions are to attempt to fit-in-to the edgy art crowd that you crave to be a part of.
nyc and la are fun places to visit- i don't hate them at all.
i have not felt threatened yet (especially on an internet forum) and i will not be dogpiling anytime soon, but in full disclosure i do believe i lent a video of
something like that to ucb. i like to help out, when i can, in the community, you know?
and if you really believe that vincent gallo won some "fight" because he bought a house and has more money than you than that is a lonely, lonely road you will be traveling on for the rest of your life because someone else will always "win." many of my friends, mr gallo's friends and poeple that are on this forum won that "fight" with him already- if they were miserable enough to "fight" with him in
that way. you know that the irony of this is that vincent gallo is desperate to fit-in-with people who "own" very little. it is a silly argument on your part.
i should say that this
could be a philosophical discussion if you are willing to concede to the fact that using sexist, racist and simple, average fightin' words as a way to make people
sad is so weak that he should be excluded from any social-political discussion as it is not able to sustain or exert much weight in such a discussion. maybe there could be a moderator that has the ability to exclude such people?
looking forward to new projects by peter sotos, dr kay redfield jamison, lauren weedman, daido moriyama, loretta lux, jack mcbrayer, kim deal, rory kennedy, alex prager, jen davis, bracha l ettinger, martha plimpton, nina nastasia, matt besser
