tommydski wrote:A very interesting website to read if you get the chance.

If that isn't the biggest disinformation site on the web . . . next to CNN, of course.

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=29761091

This is a short clip of an interview with Jefferson Morley, an ex Washington Post reporter, whom sued the CIA for not releasing records concerning George Joannides whom was handling the DRE(an anti-castro group which had contact with Oswald in the summer of 63).
Joannides was also brought out of retirement to serve as the liason to the House Assassination Committee clearing CIA records to the Committee. Of course, Blakely had no idea George was an operational CIA employee whom should have been a witness before the committee rather than screening document flow to the committee.
Morley won an appelate decision to compel CIA disclosure of documents pertaining to Joannides activities Aug-Nov 1963- to date the CIA has refused to comply with the court decision. And this court case has received close to zero press coverage.
Democracy in action!

Rick Reuben wrote:

ubercat wrote:She was attempting to put the President's head back together. Look at the footage. She grabs a bit of his head (on the trunk hood) and gets back into the car placing the bit back in his head.

There. Feel better? It's what she was trying to do.

Yeah, I'm sure she thought that surgeons could glue exploded skull shrapnel back together.

Who the hell are you to interpret her behavior anyway?

Got any opinions on why the driver slowed down rather then sped up? What was up with that braking during a crossfire, Grohl? Got any opinions on why the car had slowed drastically at the precise moment that the driver's head is turned and JFK's temple pops open?

Watch the grass background slow during the killshot.

don't know about you but my first impulse after hearing a loud sound while driving would be to slow down. just sayin'...

h8 m0dems wrote:

Rick Reuben wrote:

ubercat wrote:She was attempting to put the President's head back together. Look at the footage. She grabs a bit of his head (on the trunk hood) and gets back into the car placing the bit back in his head.

There. Feel better? It's what she was trying to do.

Yeah, I'm sure she thought that surgeons could glue exploded skull shrapnel back together.

Who the hell are you to interpret her behavior anyway?

Got any opinions on why the driver slowed down rather then sped up? What was up with that braking during a crossfire, Grohl? Got any opinions on why the car had slowed drastically at the precise moment that the driver's head is turned and JFK's temple pops open?

Watch the grass background slow during the killshot.

don't know about you but my first impulse after hearing a loud sound while driving would be to slow down. just sayin'...

that's why you're not driving the president.

i think those kind of clues really are the give away. deviation from standard procedure.

tommydski wrote:You could also watch this handy BBC documentary here.

Thanks for posting this. I just watched it, very interesting and convincing. I'm now of the opinion that Oliver Stone is an irresponsible, unreliable dick.

sparky wrote:I'm now of the opinion that Oliver Stone is an irresponsible, unreliable dick.

I get that feeling as the credits roll on most of his movies.

On an interesting side note I really wish I'd nicknamed the guy in school who lost his left testicle in a fight 'Lone Nut'.

tommydski wrote:You could also watch this handy BBC documentary here.

I watched that documentary

it was rubbish.


It basically went 'this is the official story of the assassination -




and that's why the conspiracies are rubbish!'


I kept waiting for some debunking smoking gun but it didn't debunk anything as I recall.
It just reeled out the official line and skirted over the suspicious elements of even the presented story.

Poo.


That website is pretty interesting though.

Yeah, why let the facts get in the way of a good story?

And, why let facts get in the way of confirmation bias?